Why AI? Would it help the Disparities? Would it give money in your pockets? Let Time Explain!

Why do we talk of AI?

Why do we want automation of things?

Why?

We all need money in our pockets. So, how do we earn money now that AI has arrived? Wait before AI as well, there was something brewing in the world, which was excessive competition. A competition that was pressurizing the whole world. Agree or not, it was there.

We need each person to be identified as a special person doing something he/she likes.

Have you seen animals?

Do they work 18 hours a day? No, they don’t, so why are humans working 18 hours a day? See Japan for an example? The reason is to get ahead of other humans and keep jobs secure and for some it’s sheer passion and reason. But where would this race end? This will go on. Soon, the only people who would be employed would be those who can work 18 hours a day. But for some, it’s not money, it’s passion, it’s a reason to live, we want to separate the two! Can we? Should we? So can people work twice for the same salary, and let someone else have the opportunity to learn and work for that money. It was said with hard words, and was not easy to say, as it credits another person in someone else’s wallet. The handworkers can move out to their startups and ask for more money in this way, and hire more people. So, how do we provide work to do it? Readon!

This work race would have created an imbalance, an imbalance in who earns more and who does not.

We all dream of having a nice house, a nice car, and a lovely person in our lives. That is the basics we all ask about.

And we were all ready to work 18 hours a day until AI came. And AI showed it can automate some what lot of work.

For example, AI can automate coding, but why are we allowing it? When I used to go out to market on the roadside in Delhi India, there used to be banners stating, “Coding for 5-year-olds”, “Coding for 10-year-olds”, “Teach your school children Java”, “Teach C++ to your child”.

It was enough, you can’t make school children part of this race.

Childhood is when children develop well-rounded personalities, so why put pressure on them to learn coding in school? If it was part of the regular course, in place of class work, it was ok. But if it were on the load of regular classes plus coding, what would kids do but slop.

Even I say kids should know AI, but then some other learning lessons must be deleted. Let’s keep kids learning and workload credits the same.

No, then in adults, there was a race to learn more coding languages, do more certifications, and learn online.

But no, hold on, wait, what race are you part of? Do you even know that?

Now there is a race of startups, but look, this is not a race; adult men and women are running it, it’s a profession, and as a passion and as a desire to do something. This would equalize over time; it is needed, as it gives people the freedom to work at ease, and at the same time, they can work hard.

For some, work is life, and we can’t separate it.

The race to teach coding to children has ended, and even data science is being automated now.

So, what new professions would follow from it?

Startups, experienced learning, new decent professions, such as medicine, surgery, forest welfare, pilots, agriculture, farming, musicians, bakers, cooks, chefs, dancers, environmentalists, robotic/drone engineers, expert coders (not many junior coders), researchers in field of chemistry, physics, mathematics, historians, political scientists, earthquake specialists, geologists, the list goes on, AI is not taking these roles it is helping and assisting humans in these works.

Why not startups for — “Chef on a call”, “Human expert coffee maker”, “Party help at home” ! If you like cooking, try startups like “Bakery at the corner”, “Painting made fun” for children. Why not start-ups for children’s fun when there can be start-ups for children in coding, since we are teaching our children to earn money from childhood?

We are not teaching children fun things just coding, AI or Quantum why not more children fun things?

AI would take away some of the harsh things going on, but the aim is to help humans; we all want jobs, we all will get jobs, but what — time shall explain.

Let time explain, and know nothing so widespread can be a mistake.

There is a reason, let life unfold it.

Maybe it is a blessing in disguise for so many.

Tell me how many coders/data scientists there are and how many of them got their jobs replaced. Now tell me how much they earned versus how much they would have earned if they worked 8 hours a day, it was like taking the salary of 2–3 people! Time for new careers! There would be more jobs, and there would be the right trainings for freshers.

Why not pay for 8 hours only, and have the rest of the work optional and done without pay? So many great coders love to code even at midnight, but we are creating disparities and tensions among the common people. Let other people work too — So why not “Work as a service?” when “Robotics as a service” is coming? I am not against “Robotics as a service,” but we can have “Human Work as a service too”.

Passionate, hardworking people can go to a startup option or a consultancy to ask for more money.

Why not no startup for “Nice party decor at your home”, or “Fresh Cakes baked at your home”, so on. Why only startups only with machines and robots? Even I myself write about it but both are well needed. We need some services from robots too, its is essential in so many places which in in-adept for humans.

Why don’t we introduce “Work as a service” to employ people? Is it different from freelance workers? Is it open in all sectors? Why not? It would give people the opportunity to work!

Time to look at it!

Same with coders, what is the salary of a coder, how much he/she would have earned if they worked 8–10 hours a day, almost half!

Exceptionally passionate workers would always have a place in work life, let me explain that in the coming articles.

We need better work laws, we need money in each hand!

We need each person to be identified as a special person doing something he/she likes.

We need each person to raise their earnings level!

How can you pay your bills and also have excess to enjoy pastries at a new bakery! What “A new bakery?”, obviously, we need humans to open a bakery, not a robot unless you are on Moon.

What about medicine? Don’t we need newer medicine and sooner? You ask why this rush in AI! Rush is fighting against time!

Some jobs are not meant for humans, such as mining, forest surveillance for needs and fires, and many more. We would talk about that as well.

As AI advances, I still want humans to earn. With the aim of rationalized work, people should always put humans above machines in work that humans can do, such as baking, surgery, painting, and more. My explanation is that more people can do the job that one person does, reducing the workload and salary tensions for everyone. Those who love work can’t be stopped from working extra, but let’s call in more people to do the same job.

How can AI help in this? Think! I will explain more to you in the coming sessions!

Thank you for reading.

Warm regards,

….

How to teach AI to school children. Safe AI versus Unsafe AI.

This article covers what should happen if we ban the use of AI and the internet for children, and how AI should be taught to schoolchildren.

We have to restrict AI and the internet to children and early teenagers. But if we don’t teach young children the basics of AI, they may feel lost when exposed to adulthood. Children must not feel the pressure of adult life. So, they must be taught. For this, we need servers only for school children, and servers and special AI tools only for learning.

Schoolchildren would be exposed to learning-based safe AI once they are 16–18 years old.

They must know what AI is!

They must know how AI works!

They must know the bad and good things about AI!

How should it all start?

Well, first should be theory. The theory of AI may start with the activation function of a neural network. This can be taught in 6th to 9th grade! Just the basics of supervised learning and unsupervised learning, starting with their own pet cats and dogs, about how they learn. Showing them videos of toddlers learning and other examples, such as a cat teaching its kittens how to climb a tree.

The lab manual must be designed for children.

The lab manual must contain the real-time application of Gen AI and hands-on.

This can be done by keeping limited edition servers.

The servers would be used only in a school network for children’s learning.

A VPN can be provided if parents want to access what is being taught to children from home.

These servers for schoolchildren shall provide responses to restricted question bases in a limited way.

Wrong replies from these servers would be stopped before reaching children.

The servers can even have an LLM/Small language model, trained only on children’s academic books and restricted novels, excluding novels such as Harry Potter. These LLMs for children would respond to lab manual questions; the server would have the right to stop any incorrect or unsafe responses from these LLMs. Only safe responses would be allowed.

The lab manual for 6th graders should be simple and limited to the basics. For a 10th grader, a lab manual can include questions to ask AI or even writing prompts on limited children servers.

We must ensure the right answers from the children’s school network servers.

These are just to give children hands-on experience.

The appropriate grade level to teach these hands-on skills is 10–11th grade, or when the child is 16 years old.

In earlier classes, children can learn the basics of Python, which is essential for working with AI. This can start form 6–7th grade in school.

AI is not just LLMs; it is more than just gen AI. There are AI algorithms that do not require LLMs, but they do require advanced mathematics. So such AI can be introduced to children as a black box, with only application and result computations. The example backpropagation algorithm requires the mathematics of differential equations and partial derivatives; hence, it can’t be taught to schoolchildren. However, the name is enough to introduce it in theory, increasing children’s curiosity by telling them that this takes back the error in weight updation.

All this can make children mature.

Children must be restricted to using children’s servers for homework assignments given by school teachers. They can, if necessary, use the school network VPN to access information while doing some missed classwork from home.

School teachers teaching AI must be well-versed in safe and unsafe AI for kids.

Safe AI, such as a neural network for gene detection, is considered safe AI.

While other AI, such as Grok, can be considered unsafe AI for children.

More on it.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Teaching children why AI is not allowed to them. Right AI versus the Wrong AI.

Note: The author does not say that children should be allowed internet or AI. No, the author is saying, telling children why they are not allowed to use the internet and AI. What is right AI and what is wrong AI, so that if they accidentally see an adult phone, they should know it’s not meant for them. Children must not use AI or the internet, as most governments around the world are mulling, but at the same time, we can’t deny teenagers access to what the AI world is, which should exist in children’s textbooks and on private school servers meant only for children.

I have covered many topics, including good AI versus bad AI. Today, I discuss the right AI versus the wrong AI. The bad AI may not be wrong; it’s just not good for us, such as addictive AI, which is bad but not wrong. While wrong AI is adherently and predominantly incorrect, meaning it is not just bad, it is also not right. While right AI is not necessarily good AI, once again, right AI can be ethically right but can also be bad; as said above, it can be a habit-former. Hence, a different tone of this article, right AI versus wrong AI.

So why not teach children what right AI is and what is not right AI, even if we do not allow children and teenagers to use AI and the internet? We must theoretically teach children what AI is, what right AI is, and what wrong AI is! And why are children and teenagers blocked from using the internet?

Children must not enter college without knowing what AI is!

A server for children alone for educational purposes with all kinds of deprecated features?

Children must not enter college before knowing why they were taken off the internet. Why can’t they access the internet?

Children must be exposed to a child-safe or teenage-safe version of the internet to teach them what the internet is and what AI is; however, this server is only for teaching purposes and for exposure to children as they prepare to enter adult life.

Whatever, children should not be allowed to use the internet, and AI is meant for 18+ years.

We need to make them understand concepts, why, and what!

An educational setup of servers must be there for children. Only for educational purposes!

It’s because of the good AI and the bad AI! And because certain AIs are wrong AIs and not all AIs are right AIs.

Right AI must be preached, and not all AI is inherently right; each can have some good features and some bad parameters. But a wrong AI can similarly be called a bad AI, so it can be bad for health, bad for the eyes, bad for the brain, or bad for society on a large scale.

A wrong AI can be a wrong model.

A wrong AI can be an incorrect recommendation system.

While bad AI can be a right recommendation system, a wrong product, such as focusing on certain groups of products and taking sides in some political favouritism, is the wrong thing.

We can define right AI and wrong AI as good AI and bad AI, respectively.

Time, we think about the right AI, not just good AI.

Good AI does all things that are ethically good, but at times may do some wrong AI, such as predicting the wrong product to the right customer.

While a bad AI may do the right things many times, such as most of the time, a bad AI, which is addictive in nature, always shows the right ads at the right times.

A bad AI can be like an LLM that is causing hallucinatory comments.

While a wrong AI can be like a Grok, which was not bad, but started doing wrong things to children’s photographs.

So, we need to understand that just good AI is not enough; we need the right AI as well.

Right AI must be taught to people, just like right gaze and right touch are taught.

So why not teach children what right AI is and what is not right AI, even if we do not allow children and teenagers to use AI and the internet? We must theoretically teach children what AI is, what right AI is, and what wrong AI is!

We must teach theoretical knowledge to children. As they enter the 18+ age group, they are exposed to all these things, which should not surprise them.

Once again, the author does not say that children should be allowed internet or AI. No, the author is saying, telling children why they are not allowed to use the internet and AI. What is right AI and what is wrong AI, so that if they accidentally see an adult phone, they should know it’s not meant for them. Children must not use AI and the internet, as most governments around the world are mulling, but at the same time, we can’t deny teenagers access to the theory of the AI world, which is available on private school servers meant only for children.

Unitree Robotics, A performance you cant forget

The almost 5-minute performance by Chinese Robots was just so well coordinated, well organized, well choreographed, well worked out.

Here, it is on YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R40IDdAkRZM

Hangzhou Yushu Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Unitree Robotics, is a Chinese robotics company based in Hangzhou, China.

The dance by robots showcases many hidden assets of these trained robots. But why has this not happened elsewhere on planet Earth yet! Is China leading Robotics? Or it’s just a coordinated dance?

Its flexible

Its dynamic

Its agile

All this at China’s spring festival gala. Well, the Chinese Spring Festival holds different sentimental value for Chinese people; this was certainly a surprise for the world, not just for China.

The scale of use has increased!

Tens of robots have performed in coordination to brilliance.

What the world must see?

This can be used in the right sense or the wrong way!

Imagine Chinese Military Robots on combat role like this? Scary!

These robots were not copying any human; they were dancing with children. The boys dancing with the robots were in sync with them. None of the boys got hurt, even though the robots were holding long sticks in their arms. How many boys may have been hurt in training is what no one knows.

The precision.

This can be used in the wrong ways as well.

China can use this tactic in the wrong way, say, policing and warfare.

However, why should we even give them a hint of what is wrong?

But why on Earth did no one else even tried it?

As noone thinks this way!

Noone on Earth thinks that they need Robots to dance with schoolboys!

Right, then, so noone tried.

It’s not impossible to do, but why do it? Give one good reason!

Noone thinks we should do a dangerous dance with schoolboys?

No, it’s not really full dance, it’s Kung Fu mixed with gymnastics and exercises!

How many schoolboys must have practised?

How much trust schoolboys had in robots, this was a tough one for little kids!

So, noone thought we should do kunfu and dance at this speed, so noone in the world made it! Why did China do it? China always likes to do things first!

But what would these robots do now, with a super-flexible body and super well-coordinated!

Would China give them the merit of participation?

What are the future works of Unitree in this regard?

Would Unitree patent its processes and prevent others from copying them?

Where else can such a thing be used? We all know where!

So let’s catch up? Or would it be a waste of time to do it?

What would we get if we replicated Unitree’s approach?

Can we directly focus on what is needed?

If China is doing this level of work, it is surely developing more of the same in the police and military, no doubt about it!

However, it can be used for good in paramedics, mining, relief, and rescue missions, among others.

So, scale up! Follow up! Don’t be left behind! Get on the boat!

Ruthi and Geetha, the ego of wives of Mining Giants and God’s Surprise

Note: These are fictional places, fictional incidents. All characters in this article are imaginary, and none of them bears any resemblance to any real person, living or dead. Any resemblance is a mere coincidence. The professions and associations here are fictional too.

Note: These images are generated from free AI tools, any clash with ownership is to be dealt with the provider.

They lived near Kal Superpit in Western Australia. Each day, Geetha used to embrace her husband, Peter, with love. Kalgoorlie-Boulder is located approximately 600 km east-northeast of Perth. The weather is nice most of the time. Peter was a humble man, simple, cheerful, and easy-going. His immediate junior, Lakhan, was a smart man. Lakhan was sharp in noticing even the smallest gold drop in the mines. His wife, Ruthi, was suffused with arrogance. The arrogance that her husband is so high flying, that one day very soon, he would take away the best mining industry in the world.

This place features diverse roles, including truck drivers, shovel operators, geologists, and metallurgists. With AI job losses, mining jobs give a sense of satisfaction. There are a lot of women in work too. But Ruthi took it upon herself to please the senior wives and make sure Lakhan gets his way up the ladder.

At many events organized by mining associations worldwide, she represented Lakhan. Her arrogance was so high that she used to look down on Geetha. She demeaned Geetha at so many parties. Geetha used to cry for hours, often asking God what her fault was. Why can’t women in this place live in harmony?

Geetha often went to church and asked why I was looked down on. I left my high-paying job just to be looked down at?

Geetha told Peter this. Peter was a humble man. He said to Geetha, “Look, all this would be over soon. Lakhan would move to the International Mining Association, given his credits, you won’t have to face Ruthi more then.”

“Why would we be here only, and they would touch international skies?”

Oh, this womanly quarrel never seemed to end. To this, Peter said, “Believe in God, you would be your worth, my golden star.”

Geetha cried “Why am I being looked down on?” Just because her husband was not a high flyer in his profession. Why are women being compared when men are at work?

Some days later, Geetha was doing normal chores. She prepared a cheese sandwich, Peter’s favorite breakfast.

Peter took his lunch and said, I’ll have lunch with my team at mine.

He prayed to God at home, then drove away.

Geetha was busy cleaning the kitchen.

Suddenly, she got a call. Saying, “Geetha, you have to reach Ruthi’s house now”, another woman from the wife’s group of miners called in.

She said, “Why am I working?”

“You have to come now.”

She went to Ruthi’s house on her scooter.

Five women stood, all looking shocked.

A woman, Rita said to Geetha, “You know Lakhan is the next chief of the mining association in the world.”

To this, Geetha replied, “Yes, I know he is.”

Ruthi looked at her in a stern look and said, “So call your husband, and tell him to give up his credit to Lakhan.”

Soon, a call came on Geetha’s phone; it was Peter.

“Sorry, Mrs. Ruthi, I want to attend a call, it seems urgent, he never calls at this time.”

“Wait..”

By the time she could have finished her sentence, Geetha attended the call.

“What?” Geetha said,

“Yes, Geetha, I discovered rare diamonds nearby.”

“We don’t need to work here anymore.”

“Really”

“Yes, I got an offer form diamond firm.”

Geetha was so happy. She didn’t look at any woman there and ran out on her scooter.

She said on the phone, “I am coming.”

“Wait, Geetha, there are cameramen here, dress up before coming.”

“I don’t care.”

“By God’s grace, we are blessed. God heard our prayers. I won’t be looked down on by anyone now.”

Geetha and Peter shifted to another location and lived happily ever after.

Geetha was in power, and she made sure women were not swayed by their husbands’ success or failure, but by their own merits.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

A Single “No AI” Button in offices and homes in the age of AI

Note: This is a duplicate copy. The original is on the author’s webpage.

We are five years away from an AI which is part of our daily lives, where our phones reacts and our watch guides.

This is so humane, no AI in the age of AI.

There is a need for a single button: the “No AI” button. This button would cause casdcading effect on all devices in your home or office.

A button that can switch off all AI inferences from the vicinity.

A button that could stop AI gadgets from listening.

A button that can stop your mobile from recording in case they are.

A button that can stop your tabs and laptops from collecting data to be analyzed if they are.

A button to make your robot go into standstill mode.

Yes, one button that does it all.

Or just like the one command “Abracadabra,” which does it all, meaning just say “NO AI,” and this Abracadabra is manifested.

A single button with these powerful capabilities is needed.

We need this because we sometimes need a no-robot time.

We need this as, at times, our meeting notes don’t need to go to the robot.

We need this as, at times, some deals need privacy.

Yes, AI in your office is not shared with others or with AI vendors. But we need peace of mind that the deal we are making will not be leaked.

Even if AI does not record till it is told to, still, in the future, you don’t know what kind of AI will come.

We need to think of the future.

This is not for the present but for future progress.

In the future, AI will be widely used in offices and at home.

We will need a break from AI at home and in the office in the future.

Then, in the future, we can’t make an AI button all on its own, so the brick of “No AI” mode has to be laid down now, so that we can make AI on this base.

That is to say, as we start to AI-fy our homes and offices, we should have an option of “No AI” mode.

This can be done now, as AI is beginning to proliferate in homes and offices.

In 5 years’ time, it will all change, and adding the “No AI” option will become difficult.

So, let’s go off mode from AI with a “No AI” command or a “No AI” button.

But not everyone would have the right to issue this command; it would be like a vault accessible only to the stakeholders, or it could be misused.

A single button, and all AI stops interpreting.

A single command and all your devices become non-AI gadgets in a cascading way as they are registered across a central AI processing unit.

I wish you some happy “No AI” days in the age of AI.

What do you want? AI, smart IoT, Robots, mix of it, or all or None? Next Generation?

What do you and the next generation want? AI-based smart devices, IoT-based home maintenance, or do they want robots taking away all tasks and doing it on their own, or they want a mix of these, or you or Next Gen wants it all, or they want just humans, means none of the above? Choosing one option does not stop research on it, as these can be used in urgent situations or in space explorations.

My generation and the previous generation were different! To some, extra features on smartphones are a trouble, while to others, the more features a device has, the more it is worth! For me, I want things simple, I like a simple washing machine, a simple AC, and a simple smart TV.

I just want a timer and the type of load in my washing machine, and then a start button. But when I went to Ausi, to meet my relatives, I found a complex washing machine with so many options, I said, “ Wait, why can’t I just tell the washing machine, ‘Start washing, with high load in minimum time”? I want it that simple. The puzzle of options was too much. Call it anything I like simple ease of use.

But sometime back, I wrote about “Smart AC,” which can talk to us and provide simple cooling. Someone said to me, “Keep AI out of our houses.” I was like, the remotes of AC, we keep finding combinations that work for certain options. For example I was setting auto cool in normal mode, normal blow speed. What is the problem with just telling AC to cool to a normal temperature? But I thought I had written so much about AI that he would be annoyed again, so I removed him from my subscription. He would be happy not to get any AI updates from me now. But I want a poll on it, as you are the one who would decide what AI you want- IOT, robotics, Smart AI devices, mix of them, all of them or none of them.

What is IoT that you can have? A fridge that tells you vegetables like capsicum and cucumber are used daily, and there is no stock for tomorrow. It can ask you if it can order them from the grocery store. Or say bread is not there, and it already ordered bread. Here, money computation that is bill payments would be a concern, as we can’t let machines decide what quantity of things we like. But with time the fridge can get smart and know our preferences from bar codes and image recognition. Do you like such a framework? Or you like some parts to be automated that is informing you what is not in stock, what is extra in stock, what is about to get off the shelf?

What is AI that you can have — Smart AC-I gave you an example, an AC that can talk to you. You can say to it, “I am not feeling cool. Can you be a bit cooler?” And the AC does that. When you are in the kitchen, the AC turns to normal mode. When you come from outside and say to the AC, “Hey AC, turn on, I need some cooling to ease my sweat!” And the AC does so. Same with AI in a washing machine, you go to the washing machine and say, “Washing machine, a lot of dirt on my soccer clothes, they are all white, don’t forget to use conditioner in clothes, wash them fast.” These are some examples of AI in smart devices. We are not there yet.

With only the robotics option, you would have a robot that would use locomotive powers to go to the grocery shop itself to buy things, or, on your order, can tell the grocery robot to deliver you things. The robot would be sluggish and slow in the first few years if it were deployed for use over the next 5 years. The robot would operate the washing machine on its own without the washing machine being intelligent.

What is the mix of these technologies? For example, a smart AI washing machine could interact with a grocery store to indicate that the detergent’s washing power has finished and place a request. It instructs the home robot to collect it and fill it into the washing machine slots. This is an example of a mixed approach.

None of these means all work humans would do, but with advances in technology, we don’t want to sit there and watch it all; we have to be part of advancements that are there to complement what humans are worthy of — ease of use, comfort, developments, advanced applications, benefits, time saving, and more properties.

We are nowhere near complete automation of any one of the above options. So, we have humans working on our tasks. Smart AI has reached homes, but it still needs finishing touches and the implementation of intelligence to correct issues. So, it’s the time, tell what you want, then only that would be worked on; there is no point in investing billions in robotics when you want a mix of kinds of intelligence, or if you don’t want robotics. However, these would need to be studied for research purposes, as we want to build autonomous intelligent units in space, on the Moon, on Mars, and on asteroids to spread mankind’s fingerprints, if not footprints, to far-off places.

I hope you understand these things well. I just want things to be simple. If you ask me, I would want smart AI devices to help with complicated new options on washing machines. I just like 3 buttons on a washing machine. Simple TV remote which can talk through and simple AC remote which can switch off when at I am sleeping I can say, “Please switch off”. Robots, I think, would occupy space, but it is good to stand if I am not well, so that someone can bring me hot water boiled with basil leaves. But all this with robotics would take time. Smart AI has already made a niche in your and my lives. IoT would take time; we are not that advanced yet. So think what you and the next generation want, and poll?

At Davos. Elon Musk says robot for all humans on Earth- Feasible? What do you want in the future? Tell?

Smart machines or robots, what would you choose? Or would humans work? What do you want?


Yes, there would be robots in places like Antarctica, the Arctic, and more.


But one robot each for everyone on Earth?

Even the poor will have a robot? How would he maintain the robot? Is the battery charging for free? Would electricity be free as well?

Yes electricity must be free in future, but it would take time.


Billions of robots on Earth: some live on roads due to poverty, others sleep in their cars because they don’t have a house; for some, the day kitchen turns to night bedroom. Where would their robots stay and charge? What are they supposed to do with their robots?


For the middle class, life is about a race, a race to do things and earn a living.


Yes, the upper class can afford a robot, and so can the rich and ultra-rich. But what would they do with their robots? Charge them to wait for a tea made in half an hour. Do some cleaning! This is definitely needed as we head towards equality in the workplace. But robotics is not there yet.


But not a billion robots?


A billion robots means traffic jams in markets, as everyone sends their robots to buy vegetables from a baazar (discount market). Everyone wants cheap vegetables, chicken and cheap eggs.


Do you want to bang on a robot on the road each time you go out for a walk?


In some places, like Chandni Chowk, for example, there are so many people coming to buy clothes that if robots are sent there, people would be hurt, as robots are electro-mechanical objects; one hand here from a robot means you can get injured.


Ok, all this later.


At Davos, the timeline given was 1–2 years for robots to reach yours and my life.


Well, right now, robots are learning to walk, which means they’re at the toddler stage. We consider a child an adult at the age of 18 years after schooling. So, we can say robots would learn all the lessons for adulthood in 18 years. What say?

So 18 years have passed for making robots adults and mature.
During this time, AI-based IoT (AI with the Internet of Things) would come, and our fridge would be smart and could order milk on its own from grocery shops.


After that, drones would be there. There is an issue of flying drones; the traffic rules drones must follow to not hurt anyone.


Even the poor can order their morning tea from smart IOT from their night sleeping cars. We can afford more in the coming years.


So there would be a tussle between IoT and robotics, which would win?
Smart fridges? Or smart robots?


Smart machines in kitchens or humanoid robots?


Smart juicer, smart tea machine, smart kitchenware?


Dishwashers are already on Earth; dishwashers would get smarter!


So why do we need billions of robots? Elon Musk says it’s because of abundance!


Well, I will talk about abundance sooner.


Till then, have a nice day.


Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.


Warm regards,
….

We don’t want a world filled with Robots, but those who exist must be identified as Robots Evolve with Experiences.

We don’t want a world filled with so many robots, especially humanoid robots that look like humans, that it is difficult to identify who is a robot and who is human.

So, then why all these guidelines on robots and in robotics?

Well, if they exist, they must be registered with regulations!

And if they don’t exit, there are a lot of humans! What will humans work on if all work goes to robots?

If they are working in an area, say one hit by a massive climate disaster, where humans can’t work, we need robots there; then the robots must be identifiable to be authorized and called for this work on short notice.

If they are building a picnic spot on the Moon to see Earth from there, then we can’t employ humans there; we can employ robots, so robots need identification for themselves.

Each robot has its own properties, its own learning, and its own experiences.

Each robot has solved a different problem; here, the robot’s experience matters, so the robot’s ID card matters.

The identity of a robot is like its Curriculum Vitae: each robot faces new challenges; erasing those challenges would not be good, as experience matters even in robotics and AI.

Each robot evolves with time, with the tasks it solves.

God forbid that we need urgent robots for landslide issues in a city; we can call in the best robots experienced in this area, and humans can take help from them on short notice.

We must remember robots are there to assist humans in what humans can’t do, or what is not safe for humans, or what is not meant for humans to do, for example, taking up rubble from an earthquake-hit area.

At the same time, experiences of robots or AI must not be deleted, as they add to their specialities, giving a variety of evolving robots that learn from the tasks we humans give them.

Same with my last article of passports and ID for robots, this is the case when a robot has solved many unique problems, it has evolved with time, it has learned working with humans, why erase its experiences?

Why delete a robots or ai experiences?

And why make a world filled with so many robots that humans find it difficult to walk?

Yes, if robots exist, they must be identifiable with a unique name and id. Let’s save the good experiences of robots as credentials that the robot is worthy of solving, whether rubble picking or landslide clearing.

Once again, we don’t and should not aim for a world filled with robots, but robots should complement where we need them most in tough tasks, to non-human-friendly jobs.

Passport and ID Card of Named Robots- The full name and the Surname of Robots and AI models #future #futurist #ai # sci-fi

A robot’s identity card can display its name. This can be used to register the robots as authentic. If a robot from one country is imported into another, it should comply with the new country’s rules and regulations. We must have universal identification for robots in a country. Why do we need identity cards for robots? A robot made in a country is built according to the ethics and regulations of another country. In the second country, how do we ensure the outside robot complies with its regulations? In the future, robots would use AI for a specific make in a country, in accordance with that country’s AI regulations. So even if a company says Meta makes AI robots in another country, ethics differ. The middle name can also include the country name, as per future unilateral standardization. We need to standardize naming to register all robots globally. The import of robots should be subject to immigration rules and regulations once robotics reaches its peak.

In the same way, robots would need soft copies of passports embedded in their LED screens, or, if there is no LED screen, the owner should possess the robot’s passport if the robot plans to visit another country with the owner in an aircraft (if safe), ship, or road. These are far-future processes, but we must think about them now to establish standards beforehand. If a robot travels on an international flight, it should comply with the requirements of the country it is traveling to. It may get a permit to travel, or it may be rejected. The robot’s passport would also contain the AI models it uses, the bugs fixed, and named upgrades; this is where the need for the full names of those models comes in. Hence, this article.

It’s time we started naming robots, say, Robo Bugfixer 2.0, chatKKT, and the like. That is, a robot should have a full name, a name the company wants to give it based on its properties and features, a version number, and a surname, maybe the name of the company manufacturing it.

These names can help us identify the robots if we spot them in the market or along the road. These names can help classify robots by use. This classification can be used in competitions and daily use alike.

People can find out what a robot does just from its name; the more user-friendly the name, the easier it is to understand what a robot is specialised to do. Gone are the days when one robot does all things; why not make specialized robots? Robots specialized in a single area can be useful as human experts in that area.

These names can be used in AI models; for example, we have an AI model that generates Java code for the backend. Its name can be Metu Java 3.0 Backend, or something like that. Java is a name that people around the world, across many generations, understand. Java was the name of the job market just a decade ago; everyone was learning Java, and all job vacancies were filled with the word Java. Now such things are notions of the past. But this is just to illustrate how we can name an AI model with the company name, use, version, and surname, to clarify the model name and its use.

There is no hard-and-fast rule for how a company names its robots or models. But if we all universally agree on some standardization, this can be useful in the future, when there is a bombardment of models for specialized types and specialized robots. Standardization eases the mess of the future.

Age would come when robots bombard the market, not now, though; it will take time, maybe a decade. But we must plan that, when we go to market in the future, we will see a robot and be able to ask its name. By the model name, we know its function. Another example is “ChefKing 3.0 Mety Cook”. Such a definition can help in window shopping, real shopping, or internet shopping for a robot. We need to work out standardized naming conventions of models, upgrades, and robots alike.

Same with AI models: there are so many companies; they can add their names to the surname or middle name and use them as in the models’ names. The first name can be a trendy name, which can be any name that companies decide. Standardization in naming models and robots can help in the mess around the future world of robotics.

Towards a well-organized world, where AI models are recognized by the manufacturing companies, the hosting companies, and the skill sets they possess. The skill sets can be coded as code words too, but the more human-friendly the name, the more it will be remembered.