Nidhika’s writings and articles

Helpful AI versus Dangerous AI: An illustration with Examples

Abstract: In my last article, I wrote about the double standards surrounding some AI such as Anthropic that can be deemed dangerous. Examples include Anthropic’s Mythos base model and some versions of X’s Grok AI. Why should licenses be granted to develop such Generative AI models? Are licenses even granted for such AI? Such models compromise dangerous AI. On the other hand, there are AI applications, such as in medicine and in healing Earth, that are truly helpful, useful, and needful. Examples of such AI include medical cures, timely earthquake detection to save lives, water sustainability, safe steelmaking in furnaces, better mining to save lives, and so on. So, it’s not that all AI is bad, but we must not think that all AI is good. Is it that gen AI, when combined with systems, produces the uncertainties many AI leaders have mentioned? Examples and consequences of bad and dangerous AI have been presented in [1]; hence, we must first understand what constitutes good and helpful AI and how a naïve AI can evolve into dangerous AI.

Introduction

There are many AIs that are helpful to humans, and some of those, in their development, can pose a threat to mankind. These can be seen as two sides of the same coin: AI. Helpful AI, or our well-wishers in the computing world, is one side. So far, some AI have crossed into dangerous territory, and most of them fall within the segment of AI that constitutes “generative AI.” Narrow AI has a mission, and these applications aim to fulfill that mission and achieve the goals for which the AI algorithm was designed. Generative AI (or simply, gen AI) is not explainable AI. Gen AI has posed many threats, such as indecent visualizations on X’s Grok segment and, most recently, the Mythos base model, which the company itself says can pose a threat. These were Anthropic’s own words, so Mythos was kept in the testing phase for some time until the same model, with alterations to use, was released under the product category: Fable 5.

In the documentary “AI Doc: the Apocaloptimist,” many AI leaders say they are not optimistic about how AI is developing. Some AI leaders say they are sure something will go wrong with AI developments. These include the CEOs of Anthropic and Google DeepMind, as well as the head of OpenAI, among other leaders. So, if you sow a negative thought and water it, what would you get? A sapling of negativity? Right, this is what has happened with Mythos. Why should we not control where AI is going? First, there must be a clear goal in the eyes of AI leaders; only then can they build helpful products. The AI leaders are starting with a negative thought that something will go wrong. Wait, we the people are not in a hurry.

The AI leaders are in a hurry to make more, to grab more, and yes, to innovate more. But this has become a race to capture the market faster. Stop. Think of your end goals. You are running a train at such high speed, as you said in “AI Doc: the Apocaloptimist,” not us. Stop your train and refocus on where you want to go. The same energy, if you put it into solving an Ebola-like virus, can heal the world. But you choose to develop weird generative AI models. We can live without them. This is how dangerous AI has become. Wait, refocus, find an aim, and then target the mission with the GPUs. Your aim should be just two of the following-(1) all kinds of medical research for the betterment of humanity with AI. (2) all kinds of improvements we can make to live well on planet Earth, including water, waste management, agriculture, irrigation, pesticides, and ore mining. All these are vast areas to be explored. They use designated narrow AI. Most of these AIs are helpful and predictable because they are focused. They are not like generative AI, whose outputs are often unpredictable. Adding GPUs and getting more, but without aim, is not the right strategy. In my article [1], to be specific, I was discussing gen AI, as the AI. In the next section, read more about examples of each kind of AI, the helpful AI or dangerous AI, as given in my article [1].

Illustration with Examples

Henry Ford inspired his engineers through relentless persistence and a strong belief in his vision. In Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich, Ford motivated his team to develop the new engine despite their repeated assertions that it was “impossible,” directing them to persist until they succeeded. And they did. This is how it’s made. You believe in what’s right and what you can do. If you start with a dull question mark and negative thoughts, what would you end up with? Most of these gen AI models are hit-and-trial products; be it the base work, yes, hit-and-trial is more difficult than theory. Sometimes it’s about adding more compute power; sometimes it’s about adding more data. All data on Earth would soon be consumed by AI. What would remain would be compute power. Stop, rethink, leaders! You are sowing negativity in systems, and what you are getting is negative AI applications. So, in the future, licenses must be granted to operate processors large enough to affect mankind on a large scale. In the future, the AI lead must be accountable. Saying “wrong can happen” or that the AI training is running fast is no excuse. You are competing to acquire more users, and it has become an ugly race.

Illustrations of dangerous AI have been presented in my article [1]. Mostly, these are generative AI models trained on all kinds of content available on the internet. In the absence of data categorization on the internet, gen AI can take wrong turns when traversing complex neural network paths. One way is to manually supervise the large volume of data, which seems impractical unless it’s automated using techniques discussed at the end. There are many studies on interpreting the AI brain; however, no clear outputs have been documented yet.

Even biological AI has both dangerous and helpful components. Hence, before licenses are granted to AI in the chemical and biological sciences, clear guidelines must be established. It should not be like current generative AI: develop whatever the AI makes, add more GPUs, and then see. No, this is not the way to progress further.

AI can be very helpful in saving someone’s life in a highly crowded hospital or during alerts from climate calamities, or Earth-related phenomena such as earthquakes. These aims can all be applied to the medical use of AI, whether in drug discovery or other applications, and to the care of Earth and humanity. The applications where AI is helpful are listed as follows; most of them are not gen AI:

1. Drug discovery

2. Medical procedures with robotics arms

3. Vaccine innovations

4. Disease management such as dementia

5. Water Management

6. Wastewater treatments

7. Climate calamity detection and weather alerts.

8. Steelmaking furnace

9. Document management systems

10. Image processing applications

11. Biometrics

12. Railways and travel ticket booking

13. Agriculture though life cycle

14. Food safety checks

15. Processed foods

16. Potential use in mining

17. New sources of energy

18. Innovation

19. Research speedup

20. Routing paths

21. Optimal routes for transport and travel

22. Robotics for space explorations

23. Energy management

24. Boosting power generation

25. Smart watches

26. Volcanic activity and detection

27. Automatic home appliances such as washing machine, fridge etc.

28. Garbage management

29. Helpful AI gadgets, to mention a few.

These are some of the broad categories of AI applications that are helpful. However, if engineers combine these and other applications with gen AI, there is a risk that this AI could become dangerous. Hence, we must ensure that the AI systems we build are error-free and grounded in realistic assertions. Protocols must be developed to integrate the latest AI into existing AI systems in a helpful way. If an AI leader says they are not sure what wrong can go with their AI, then stop. We don’t need their products then. They can be dangerous AI. Not just that we must stop using them, but they must be banned. We need safe, predictable AI that helps humans. AI was designed to mimic the workings of the human brain. We want AI that helps humans, not AI that is dangerous to humans. Improving compute times can speed up responses and optimize prompt time and output, but we don’t want cyber threats with your extra-high-speed AI, no. On the one hand, some leaders say they don’t know how AI can be harmful; on the other hand, they develop new models with more compute. These are the double standards I mentioned in my last article.

Conclusion and Future Work

Gen AI can be made semi-supervised to help deliver better solutions for humanity and mankind’s very purpose, while also supporting the restoration of Earth, which includes humans, flora, and fauna, as a pivotal role. However, if no improvements are made, there is no point in simply increasing processing speeds and hacking the world. To stop this, licenses must be granted for rightful use, with a clear focus on aims. If the leader of an AI company says there may be a chance of errors or of AI getting derailed, it means it could happen, and it means the leader is giving flexibility for errors to occur. This does not happen in real-world applications of other products. You make a product with a clear-cut objective: the desired outputs and the required inputs. There are no “ifs and buts.” Yes, AI may be different, but that is not how you give jobs to humans with some training. If you say AI mimics the human brain, then see how you hire an engineer in a particular stream. You have full trust in their capabilities before you hire them. So, in the future, licenses must be granted to operate processors large enough to affect mankind on a large scale. In the future, the AI lead must be accountable. Saying “wrong can happen” or that the AI training is running fast is no excuse. You are competing to acquire more users, and it has become an ugly race. If you can, with confidence, say it can’t harm mankind, well and good. Else, do not develop those AI models you doubt. Please.

References

[1] (1) (PDF) Double Standards of AI: Stop your AI Model till…

Double Standards of AI: Stop your AI Model till…

Abstract: AI and AI leaders are using double standards, and people are not looking at it. On the one hand, AI leaders say they are advancing technologies for the betterment, while they are just making humans prisoners of their apps. Human innovation is going undetected. Youths are lost with no future projections. AI companies like Anthropic, acting like world leaders, are saying they want AI to be regulated while they are themselves releasing unchecked models like Mythos 5 and Fable 5 by Anthropic. Is this not double standards? They say they want to give people some form of money; you are stealing their livelihoods and then make them look to you for each penny? This is what it means by their words, as far as I can understand. And on top of that, the energy the AI uses is eating the world’s power needs. The waste products of AI companies are dirtying the water. What water would we drink then? What food would we eat? It’s all affected by AI byproducts. Why do we need AI for? We can work, drink clean water, and live in healthy environments free from energy surges. Stop AI till you answer us.

Keywords: AI Ethics, AI, Gen AI, Future, Futurist, Humanity, People, World

Introduction

Many AI companies are practicing double standards. On one hand, they say they want governments to regulate AI and see unchecked AI in the world, while they themselves are freely developing unchecked AI. Why no one is stopping Anthropic from developing models like Mythos 5. Such models should not have been developed in the first place. But Anthropic has somehow obtained permission to develop potentially critical models. Then they launch the Mythos 5 model with restrictions, called Fable 5, the same model, with checks on what users are asking and downgrading to Opus 4.8 when such a prompt is reached. Anthropic CEO has a pessimistic outlook about AI, as he once said, he is doubtful that what would be developed with AI can be dangerous. According to Napoleon Hill, if you think negatively, negative takes form in your life, and this is what happened with the Anthropic Mythos 5 model. Anyways, we are not here to change someone’s perception. We are here to tell that AI must stop till any wrong models are stopped before they germinate from the seed of wrong thoughts.

Many big AI companies are looking into AI consciousness and what happens inside an AI brain. Well, to date, none has been answered. We, the people, need answers; this is our world. You are few in number; you have to tell us what you learned about AI consciousness. You have put money into AI consciousness; you have to brief us on what you learned from it. You have done research on “what happens inside an AI brain”; tell us the summary. Or is it something you want to hide?

We don’t want universal basic income; we are not beggars; we want to earn our own money or receive the respect and money we deserve for various reasons, one of which can include intellectual ability. We want to live with respect, as AI leaders want to, but there is a difference; AI leaders want to win the world by marketing and advertisements, then AI leaders can play selective favoritism; who knows? All we know about AI leaders is that they made AI models which people buy and use. We are happy in democracies; we are happy to vote. Voting is our right, but who are you? We didn’t elect you; we buy your shares to make money, and you take money out of our shares to sell us to AI? There would be no voting when AI takes over; then we would all become subject to a few rich people, and our lives would become dependent on AI and AI-related domains.

AI implications

Governments must verify which companies have the rights to develop critical models, especially whether they have developed a prior model that was critical to safety protocols. This means questions must be asked about why Anthropic was allowed to develop Mythos 5. What does it know about AI Mind, and how did it make this model without knowing it can be harmful? Why are people not saying anything? How do we know AI people are not hiding anything? Given we have found out that double standards are there in talks of AI people. AI leaders are getting fame and power in a short time as no one has in the past; they are liking the taste of success, and they want to make more fame- what fame, to run the world! Note, we didn’t vote for them, and they are here telling us how they want to give us pocket money!

People’s jobs can be taken out like a whirlwind. We can fill out our resumes on our own; we don’t need AI loops to do it. Why don’t people say this? We want to work in offices; let AI be limited to medical use, too, not by companies that have, in the past, developed critical models. How can you trust biological models by such companies?

User data is studied by all AI companies, which means users are spied on. Humans would soon become objects in the hands of AI companies, which are gaining immense power by vast amounts of data. The companies are publishing papers on the kinds of prompts users pose after receiving answers. This is called spy governance over innocent users who don’t know they are being watched.

If this continues, AI would make some people very rich while leaving the rest of the population unemployed, jobless, and aimless. Professions not only provide us with a way to earn money but also give our lives meaning. They give us a sense of satisfaction and fill our lives. However small our professional capabilities may be, they give us a reason. Professions give us a way to look at things differently. If the youth today were without a profession, what would life be like? What are we giving to our future generations, “a trap in rat mouse” or “A parrot cage”? No, we can’t let our future generations live in a parrot cage; this cage is built by AI.

I have so many times said, “Yes, just because some sci-fi movies are made on AI, that does not mean we need to accomplish sci-fi.” No, we can’t let “Sci-fi” dreams accomplish without assessing what the future of a “sci-fi” accomplishment means in real life. Let sci-fi be sci-fi; let reality be reality! Accept reality-that we are humans! We are living beings; AI is a manipulated model that can be moderated to serve the vested interests of some unelected people.

Have AI and Tech companies that make processors and chips analyzed the effects of all these developments on humanity? This is a war on humanity! AI is fighting with us! AI wants to hack humanity. This is yet to be shown in a sci-fi story? Time to show this in sci-fi movie? AI taking over humans.

Other side effects of AI are on the environment and the cost of living. The water collected near AI data centers is contaminated and appears black. It’s not even drinkable. What are we doing all this AI for when the water we drink is unsustainable? What would people, animals, and plants drink then? What is the future for that like? Or would the AI companies run their AI models to find a way to clean this water? That too, using oil and coal, making the cost of living even more expensive?

AI is needed only for medical cures and some cures for Earth; the rest we need to stop AI from becoming a spider web on the people of Earth. We need AI research for medical use and saving Earth only.

Conclusion and Future Works

In short, AI is moving at a very fast pace. It’s time people realize its side effects. Yes, it’s good to see answers on screen in 5 seconds, but do you know how much power that 5-second answer consumes? Do you know how much water is polluted with one answer? Can’t you find this answer in a normal browser? Why do we need Gen AI, which is eating our Earth? And not just this, your data, your preferences, your inter-prompt thoughts- they are all going into AI. And more than that, they want to take away professions and the very baseline on which civilizations were built — humanity.

AI wants to take away all professions, so that one day people are just trapped in parrot cages. This is an attempt at colonization by AI companies in the modern era through the internet. They want to provide money to people after all work is taken by AI companies. Wait, did you vote for them? Were they selected by you? No, so why are you choosing to follow them? They are giving you money in the form of share profits, but that does not mean you select them as your leader, or is it money that is driving you? For example, people trust that SpaceX will profit, so they want to invest in its shares. But that does not mean you want their CEO, Elon Musk, to be President of the World? Do you? If you have forgotten, see the problems he caused in the USA 1.5 years ago: a massive, inhumane job termination letter sent on Elon’s order. So, what I want to say is that the AI leaders are not elected by people, but as AI progresses, these AI leaders would become something like monarchs — owning the Earth. So, wake up before it’s too late. Why do you like them? Because their companies’ shares give you profits? So, you are mean here, but this is temporary meanness. Look at the future now. Trapped by AI or freedom, what do you choose? Can’t you find your job on your own? Why do you need AI loops to do so? Or is this just the beginning of a colonization attempt on the internet? Think over it and wake up, people.

Iran owes the world the rise in all prices? Iran can’t be trusted!

#world #global_affairs

What would happen when the Strait of Hormuz is opened to the world? Prices of crude oil would go down, and prices of gas, oil, and other related products would go down sharply. The extent would be sharp. And most importantly, people would forget that the USA won over Iran. This is not what Iran wants; Iran wants to tell the world each day that the USA decimated Iran and that Iran still has power. Yes, Iran is showing it is powerful by keeping the keys to the Strait of Hormuz locked with it.

Iran, by the way, by closing the Strait of Hormuz, wants to show it is still powerful. That Iran still has power to stop the world. And it did it.

Sooner or later, the Strait of Hormuz would be open; the prices of crude oil would drop sharply after that. But why? There are so many filled tankers in Hormuz, ready for delivery. It would be fast then.

There would be a cascading effect on other products across various streams. Not just gasoline, diesel, petrol, LNG, fertilizers, and petrochemicals, but other products too would take the effect into consideration. Not just products, but so many forms of services increased in price during the Hormuz closure.

This means even the services and labor fees that increased during the Hormuz closure and hike period would decrease. For example, truck drivers asked higher charges for the same delivery work during this period. This happened as oil prices increased. Would truck drivers revert to old charges? It’s difficult to say, as they didn’t have much salary revision before Hormuz happened. Yes, truck drivers, fertilizers, and gas increased charges raised the rates for grocery, vegetables, and even milk. So would milk be sold at old prices then after Hormuz is opened? Would businesses return to old prices? No as we can’t trust Iran.

Who is to pay for the higher charges? We are paying higher for milk. Should Iran pay? Who else?

Crude oil is around 110$ a barrel; it can come down to 70$ within the time of the opening of Hormuz. But the complex geopolitical situation makes it complex, as prices can rise again, as Iran is notorious for striking US targets again. A ceasefire can be put in place, but no one can predict Iran’s action, given Iran wants to show it still has huge strength that even the USA is afraid to go to Hormuz to help vessels of oil come out of it.

How long would all this last? What does that mean?

Well, it all depends on Iran.

Iran is taking things for granted.

First, it declared victory over the war, without signing any agreement.

Then it went on and off attacking USA stations in the Middle East with USA allies. But why? Ask Iran why it is doing this? That too when a temporary ceasefire is ongoing.

Latest: Iran shot down a US helicopter. Why? If it wants peace?

So, one more thing: it is not the USA; it is Iran that has closed the Hormuz Strait.

The USA wants the Hormuz to remain open at all times, indeed as soon as possible. In fact, the USA tried this several times.

So all these price rises Iran should pay to the world.

Iran, in exchange for agreeing to open the Strait of Hormuz, wants access to its frozen assets. Well, Iran pay the world the rise in milk and grocery prices.

Even people in Iran are living with hyperinflation, so what to say then. But why are all people of the world paying extra charges just because Iran is adamant?

Thanks for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

What Would New-Age Jobs Look Like: Moon Inhabitation with Ongoing AI Jobs Takeover. Part-I

Greetings from this side,

With the growth of AI, a lot of automation is being introduced across both white-collar and blue-collar jobs. There are layoffs in numbers across industries. There are still jobs that are deemed to remain despite the AI hype.

But what would jobs of the future look like when AI is here?

There are 8.3 billion people worldwide, with 8 billion officially reached in 2022, according to the United Nations Population Fund.

How to provide jobs for even the half of popullation?

The global working-age population is approximately 5 billion people.

What jobs to provide for 5 billion people worldwide?

How many of these jobs have been affected by AI? It is estimated that AI may displace approximately 10–15% of the workforce in the years to come.

Even though job displacement happens, many developed nations face labor shortages due to aging populations.

Despite fears of displacement, there are predictions that AI will create many jobs, especially in AI design and AI oversight.

Up to 50% of all roles will be transformed by AI, including entry-level jobs. So, where would freshers get their experience from?

How would those working compete for salaries?

Businesses are in losses! How would profits be made?

Time to think one or two steps ahead?

Time to think about what future opportunities are and to train younger generations for what is coming!

Yes, if we want to extend life to the Moon, then time to think is now!

We need to train younger generations for this mission!

Why only USA participating in it?

Why not China, the UAE, India, South Korea, and Japan participate in it too?

To participate in inhabiting the Moon with humans is a big task.

We need young, energetic people to work on this mission.

Why not Japan take the lead? Why depend only on SpaceX to inhabit the Moon?

8.3 billion people on Earth are looking to governments for a clear view of the future!

The near future is when it takes 10 days to get to the Moon! But the rest needs to be officially done!

Why not train and place new trainees on these jobs for the Moon Mission?

Moon- our second home! We are coming! Let’s give it good preparation!

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

I am Back Again! Be careful of summer heat!

Hello everyone!

How are you doing?

I am sorry I could not write during the past month. I am really sorry for that.

The month passed by getting my Root Canal Treatments (RCTs) done, other dental things, and some other work I needed to do.

It was hot here, as hot as 43 degrees, and the RCT and tooth team gave me appointments only in the afternoon. Then I was given some antibiotics, and with other engagements, I could not really do my work during that time. So, it was like summer vacation for me. I took care of myself, and I want to share with you how I did so while I was outside for so many days in the summer heat of Delhi, where temperatures soared to 44 degrees. I am sharing this so that you can also take care of yourself.

It was urgent for me, so I had to go in the heat. When I used to go in the afternoons, on my way back, I was left with heat in my body; I used to hydrate with summer drinks. I’ll share with you some of my summer heat-beating drinks recipes in my recipe blogs.

We all must all take care as summer comes in; if we go out, we must keep our bodies well hydrated with water and salts.

This image above is generated by AI. But it reflects my trips to the dentist over the past month. Last week was better in Delhi, but my work was mostly done in hot heat.

It was hot.

The temperatures were soaring to 42–44 degrees in Delhi.

So, I recommend you all not to go out in this heat. And if, like me, you have to go out in the sun, make sure you do the following as I did:

— Wear your sunscreen layer on your face and hands. Cover face with an extra layer of foundation with nice SPF!

— Take an umbrella.

— Take a scarf to cover the face.

— Wear full-sleeve shirts.

— Make sure you drink a lot of water.

— Salted drinks such as Lemon drinks can be really good. Carry a water bottle filled with a lemon-salted drink if you have to stay in the sun for long.

— There should be no dehydration.

— Then, you must make sure to eat nice summer fruits and juicy vegetables as you come out of the sun.

— Don’t stay in the sun for long; it can cause harm. Use umbrella and scarf, be covered.

— Make sure you have the right salt content in your body, so a nice light meal before exposure to the sun is needed.

— Don’t forget your other medications.

— Avoid hot coffee.

— Splash cold water on your face and hands.

— Wear loose cotton clothes.

— Make sure to take shade and stay out of the sun as much as you can. So, take care to avoid sun exposure.

Summers are here for a little while longer around the world. So, take extra care of your body for as long as the summer stays.

Stay hydrated with salts and water!

Take care

Subscribe for updates.

Thank you for reading.

State-of-the-Art Robotics Applications and Their Effect on Migration.

#future #futurist #ai #robotics

Robotics is evolving rapidly. Robotics applications are even faster. Robotics is tackling new challenges like never before. Think of anything, and robotics has its imprint in that field. Think of working at home, handling documents in the office, manufacturing, or running a marathon in the park. Robotics is everywhere.

What will happen if we embrace AI and robotics? One thing is sure, it would reduce the number of skilled and unskilled workers the developed world needs from outside their countries. What about the developing world and the underdeveloped world?

Migrations were created because the local population was not enough to produce the work required by development and other needs.

Migration is not just in the USA but also in countries like Germany, which have recently specified a lack of skilled professionals. Likewise, other countries would specify their desire to admit fewer migrants as work gets automated by humanoids, cobots, and manufacturing bots.

As AI and robotics increase, migration needs would decrease. The home population of a country itself seeks work, leaving aside new migration needs.

Are we headed towards a world with robotics? Then migration around the world would decline.

Would robotics take over the remaining jobs, the jobs left by AI, the jobs that an AI mind can’t do?

Would robotics be taxed? Then this would replace migrants’ taxes. So a country wont be in deficit.

What are other applications of robotics?

Would robotics provide care for the needy in the future?

What jobs would remain then?

Who are all the competing players in Robotics?

Robotics can be categorized in the following categories:

Industrial Automation. The “Big Four” — FANUC, ABB, Yaskawa, and KUKA are the global leaders of industrial robotics. They help humans in mechanical jobs such as welding, manufacturing, and material handling.
Humanoid & General-Purpose. Produced by likse of Unitree, Boston Dynamics, Agility Robotics, Figure AI, and Tesla. They look very much like humans physically; each has a face, a chest, two legs, and walks and talks like humans.
Collaborative Robots (Cobots). Produced by the likes of Universal Robots and Doosan Robotics. These robots work in collaboration with humans, sharing human space.
Robotic cars. These are autonomous cars they too replace jobs such as jobs of drivers and their helpers.

The progress AI has made is enormous; at the same time, robotics has also strengthened in the past few years. A humanoid robot is the most common robot that comes to mind when someone thinks of robotics. However, industrial robots and cobots are no less behind in terms of development.

AI has taken over so many human jobs. What would happen when Tesla plans to launch its robots in a year or so? You all may know Tesla’s aim to launch hundreds of thousands to millions of humanoid robots. The remaining jobs would be taken by robotics, then? There would be no need for migrations then, especially skilled migrations, which would end with AI specialization in adults, while unskilled automation would bring robotics to the forefront anywhere from December 2026 to early 2027, ending or reducing unskilled migrations substantially. Money going to robotics automation can be put to the welfare of the population, such as in free healthcare for all citizens and retirement benefits to all people of a country.

Rich countries would focus on their populations. Providing the salary to each family, taking care of their families, as the government would provide money to each citizen of a country. The people would be taken care of by the government.

What would humans do then? Get care from governments, live in harmony, and more to come.

Developed and underdeveloped nations must take part in this once-in-a-lifetime momentum and know there are developments that can improve their lives as well. Richer countries would donate to funds for underdeveloped countries to come in line with developed nations.

Well, robotics is good, if we think about space exploration, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on humanoid robots that haven’t been widely tested, that would be too early, no?

The number of competitors in each field is huge.

Do we need so many humanoid robots?

Yes, robotics can provide care to the needy, but if it is specially trained for one.

Why not classify humanoid robots in a category?

Categories like the following can specialize humanoid robotics to more precise applications.

Robots for care
Robots for home cleaning, grocery, and garden work
Robots for hospitals
Robots for the office
Robots for policing?
Robotics for space missions.
Truck driving robots if deemed safe. For long-distance driving, it is not very adjustable to human workers. This can be worked out with robo Trucks or robotic cars if deemed fit with driving licience.
Outdoor robots for street cleaning, garbage collection, and security.

But why would someone buy a different robot for home cleaning, grocery, and garden work? Would people want it all in one package? The same reason to send a humanoid robot to general users with training and instructions for space missions. Hence, we need more refinements in robotics itself.

We need these classifications in robotics, not just for cost but also for time, experience, and specialization.

Well, whatever money is saved must be taxed and sent to the government to help create new employments or provide unemployment benefits to the citizens.

There are four kinds of robots, as explained above. Each of the these kinds of robots would have a different tax, as they are processed and replace human jobs in different ways. The amount of tax can be computed by the job replaced by the robot of the above three kinds.

Cobots, too, are special robots and have an altogether different application. They replace small jobs and help with human work.

Humanoid robots work like humans and can replace the entire job of one or more humans when they are deployed in the future. Manufacturing robots are needed because they perform dangerous work that is repetitive and can harm humans, such as welding car parts.

What would humans do then? Well, humaoids are not yet deployed. Once we enter the future and see humanoids deployed in houses across the developed world, followed by the ultra-rich parts of the developing world. We would see automation on a scale. Jobs would be impacted. Quality of life would change. Migrations would decrease, as most work can be handled by AI or robotics. So, plan for the future by looking at these developments that are going on in the world from a futuristic view.

Mars/Moon/Europa Mission can create hundreds of thousands of Jobs

#ai #jobs #futurist #sci-fi #sciencefiction

Note: AI hospital, AI doctor and AI doctors on chatbot are two different things altogether. AI doctor don’t exist, AI chatbots are not doctors.

The Mars and Moon mission can create hundreds of thousands of jobs. These jobs won’t be limited to the USA. As Earth decides to plant Solar System bases on these places. They would be spread across the globe of Mars and Moon as more and more countries seek to inhabit Mars and the Moon. As for me, I do not like the word “colonize Mars” but that is how it has been used. Or are we heading to “Eurupa”? Eurupa of Jupiter harbors a massive under ground ocean providing liquid water, chemistry, and energy — the main raw material for life. Whatever, if in the coming times we can’t claim that Mars can have life, we head to Europa, Jupiter’s moon. Simple, our plans don’t go in vain; these jobs don’t go in vain.

This is not just one word, “inhabit Mars.” No, it’s a big project, a big plan. We know we have to extend mankind beyond Earth. We know the International Space Station is in place. The next aim was the Moon, and we humans recently succeeded in a mission to the Moon. We need stations on Mars, Venus and Moon. Now it is time to think big, to think beyond the great work of stepping on the Moon. Yes, stepping on the Moon would be a great achievement for mankind. We are waiting for it to happen again after decades of a break. But we should not just wait for that to happen. The answer is — NO. We need to prepare for the next steps. What are the next steps?

We need to understand that we should not wait to inhabit the satellite and the planets near Earth. This requires planned programs. Until plans come based on feedback from rovers on Mars, the Moon, or Venus, we can prepare ourselves. We know we are going to the Moon, Mars, and Venus, so why not start making the things we need? What are the things needed for inhabiting a foreign planet?

Well, if we have to step up there, tents won’t be enough for bathrooms, toilets, first aid, and AI hospitals. We can get assembled toilets, bathrooms, and AI based medical clinics of various kinds ready; indeed, we need makeshift assembled AI hospitals before humans can go there. Make these as parts, and we ship them in parts. These parts will be assembled there when we reach Mars, the Moon, and Venus, with our flags! Yes, is a flag necessary? How else can we inhabit, with no preparation on our end! The one who does the most preparations gets the most on the map of new planet or Satellite! Is it that we all have to work on Mars and Moon missions?

Yes, all countries must actively participate in the inhabitation of the Moon, Mars, and Venus. We must set up oxygen extraction units that can be sent as parts, with the parts assembled on Mars/Moon by robots. The parts would be made on Earth, as were parts for bathrooms, toilets, AI medical clinics, AI robotic nurse, AI robotic doctors or, more specifically, with “Made in Paris” or “Made in Hungary” taglines. This would create competition on Earth, and we would be able to inhabit Mars/Moon with greater intensity. What would this inhabitation on Mars/Moon give us?

What does inhabiting Mars or the Moon give us? Do we need to live beyond Earth? What are people doing? Just recreating fashion, music, and so on. But we need to understand that humankind has reached a cliff. We need to look ahead of it. We need jobs and a reason for them. Making parts for assembly on Mars or the Moon would not only be a good business; it would give humans jobs. Creating robots for Mars or the Moon would create jobs. How many jobs?

Well, hundreds and thousands of jobs would be created for a program of inhabitation of Mars/Moon. Our, meaning Earth’s, rovers have detected the presence of water and oxygen. As far as I have read, we need to extract water and oxygen; the rest would follow. So, until we are doing this, extraction of oxygen and water by sending the required devices we can make, parts that can be assembled on Mars/Moon when spaceships are ready. Would spaceship creation also create jobs?

Yes, the creation of spaceships is itself a major industry, but sadly, no major work has begun in this domain. Yes, we have started very well with rockets, satellites, and more, but real spaceships capable of delivering these parts for assembly on Mars or the Moon have not yet begun.

To explain how this would create jobs, there would be hundreds of thousands of them. Consider the first rocket to Mars to inhabit there. They would need AI-based medical care there, as there are fewer humans there and not all would be doctors. So we need makeshift, assembled hospital units that need to be installed on Mars before humans reach Mars. These parts need to be installed by robots on Mars before humans reach Mars after a 3-month journey. This drill would be done on all sides and all locations of Mars. We then need assembled instruments that can do mining on Mars with help of robots. We would also need a device that can extract oxygen from the atmosphere. Until we learn how to mass produce water and oxygen on Mars/Moon, we need to rely on these. As science progresses, we would get answers, but we won’t be able to create assembled medical clinics suddenly. These AI clinics would be operated with AI bots and humans on planet Earth. These constructions would create a lot of jobs along with discoveries with help of AI to make oxygen and water on Mars! Together we can do it!

I give you an example, here in India before any festival comes, the market is flooded with those festival essentials however many are from “Made in China” label. Now is the chance for every country to deliver a “Made in abc” label assembled products for our mission of life beyond Earth, weather its Mars or Europa time will tell. But we need units on Mars, Moon, and so on. So, make in advance, be ready for deliveries, make now, think of future of your generations.

And in the end I would like to say, whatever, if in the coming times we can’t claim that Mars/Moon/Venus can have life, we head to Europa, Jupiter’s moon. Simple, our plans don’t go in vain; these jobs don’t go in vain, these products wont go in vain. Europa for sure can possess biological life. Who knows if it already has one? Ready to face another life on Europa? No, so ready to inhabit Europa!

Manufacturing would get a major boost as we build assembled hospitals, robots, and houses to be sent to Mars/Moon. These would be unloaded from the spaceship. Then AI robots would come and assemble these hospitals, toilets, houses, and offices on Mars/Moon. A space station in each planet of Solar System, ready with AI, to inhabit(colonize) the Solar System! Do you want to be left behind? Don’t you want to see the other side of Europa one day? A bud of a red rose on Europa, from a satellite on Earth? Don’t you want to be part of that future and see it? It’s a distant future. Maybe your grandchildren may one day see this dream come true.

These are the aims mankind must look up to. These are the pathways, mankind is on a cliff, see beyond the cliff. There is a lot to do, there is a lot to work for, there is a lot to aim for. Yes salary for unemployed is a mandatory thing, but we need to do a lot of work, there are lot of jobs, not just in robotics, but in assembling, in part generation in almost all kinds of subjects. Its just hope we must stick too. And know these “Made in abc” assembled products wont go waste, they would be put to use in Earths extra-territorial bases in THE SOLAR SYSTEM.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Race for Mars based AI lagging behind?

#ai #future #robotics #futurist

It’s 2026, mass unemployment, problems of feeding huge populations, and growing concerns about the future of Earth. We need to be motivated by our Mars/Moon missions because they extend humanity to another planet or satellite, gives more space for life, gives employment and more.

Humanity had an aim: to make life on Moon and Mars! But what steps are taken towards it? We are lagging behind so we can take help from AI for this. If we want life on the Moon and Mars, we must take help form robotics and AI. If we want to make Moon/Mars green, the following must be taken into consideration:

— Infrastructure for humans to use when they visit Moon/Mars. Infrastructure include AI bathrooms, restrooms, toilets, some water supply, AI hospitals, first-aid kits, stored oxygen and lot of robots to help humans in these works.

— We need robots to be on Mars and Moon before we humans go to Mars-Moon. The robots would take care of providing us with water, food and oxygen, we need intelligent robots on Mars for all this.

— We should work in remotly to guide robots on Mars to make restrooms on Mars.

— We should remote control robots on Mars to build infrastructure on Mars and Moon.

— We should start robots to dig in Mars and Moon now to find water underground. If not now then when? We can take help of nuclear power for doing the same.

— We should make robots work on Mars to set up Clinics and Hospitals on Mars/Moon. We need AI hospitals which can be operated remotely from Earth or by robots automonously if we can do it. Fragments of AI hospitals on Mars can be taken from Earth and can be reassembled on Mars/Moon.

— We are getting late in Mars/Moon mission. Sending just rockets is not enough. We must make reassemblable medical clinics on Earth to be taken to Mars/Moon.

— We must ready Mars/Moon to be extracted of underground water.

— So more robots must be send to Mars/Moon to assemble hospitals, restrooms and other needs.

— We must make robots ready to work on Mars. Autnomous robots which can be taught what we want to make.

— AI Nurse and AI robot doctors would be needed to help basis first aid on Mars/Moon.

— Medical bots installations with bots on Mars/Moon so that remotely good doctors from Earth can do medical procedures.

— Mars/Moon mission just not only gives employments here on Earth, massive employments would be given for Mars/Moon missions but it would also make Mars/Moon habitable.

— Extracting oxygen and water from land and air of Mars/Moon are essential. We need robotics for that.

— We need to make these things at a higher rate than today.

— We have to speed up for that.

In the name of mankind to Mars/Moon.

Thank you for reading.

Teaching children through books or through screens. Balance on which side?

Balancing knowledge and technology

So, when it comes to children, we need to be more cautious. The current trend for governments around the world is to shift their focus from tablets and laptops, once introduced in schools, back to paper, pen, and physical books.

What is the right approach for children?

It is a lengthy discussion; we will cover some points here.

There are two things first:

What to teach?
How to teach?

Once what to teach is decided, it can help in deciding how to teach!

As in Sweden, Johan Pehrson served as Sweden’s Minister for Education (September 2024 — June 2025), focused on physical textbooks and banning electronic gadgets in schools, among other measures. The new Education Minister of Sweden, Simona Mohamsson Pehrson, has a continued agenda to use physical textbooks and to ban mobile phones in schools apart from other issues.

Such measures are being talked about around the globe, Sweden not being alone.

But there are also criticisms of this. Some say that this can lead to a generation that may be unemployed, as they are not aware of tech and AI when they graduate from school. This criticism should not be taken lightly. We need the kids growing up in AI to know what AI is!

The best approach is a balance between books and gadgets, as shown in the image above.

Let’s talk about young kids first. Children under 10 years of age, if exposed to gadgets, can compel parents to show them gadgets while they eat or drink milk. This is a trend in the part of the world I live in, and parents have to give in. So we should stop teaching gadgets and tech to children under 10 years of age.

Above the age of 10, children can be introduced to AI and Tech, but smartly, knowing we need to open the tech funnel slowly.

Students must be taught theory from books, and pupils must learn through paper and pen, a nice initiative taken by Sweden. But some syllabi must be cut somewhere to teach students what AI is, a world they will face one day.

Hence, we must teach students the theory of Tech and AI, with labs where practicals are held. In practicals, these senior school children would learn how to use gadgets, what a prompt is, what a web browser is, how to search on Google, and so on. These topics would be discussed in detail in upcoming newsletters.

But at the same time, we know some secondary school students, especially teenagers, can try pranks, so they must be given a private network to work on. Not the entire internet. Just a private network where they can work on learning, not trying, learning is the aim. This can be like a safeguard to any harm they can cause out of their curiosity to try new things, a symbol of growing age, and curiosity!

This would ensure that pupils have understood the theory through printed books, as Pehrson of Sweden proposed, and, at the same time, in labs, they would be taught how to use a laptop and a smartwatch.

Another thing that stops children from using mobile phones is not enough; they must be stopped from using any smart gadget, such as a tabs, or even from overreliance on other AI tools till they become of right age. What is the right age for which device, we need to understand that as well.

This is to say, basic digital skills to be added to the printed books curriculum, with practical labs in computer rooms, are needed so that children are ready to face the adult world with confidence and pride.

This is not easy to weigh each topic that must be taught and each thing to be practiced in the computer and AI labs. There are students who are very curious and want to skip degrees and enter work right after school. Denying them this opportunity to learn can make them feel set back.

However, we must include paper-and-pencil studies, as proposed by Pehrson of Sweden. This would help in learning. Paper and pencil mean something, and it is a fact not to be denied that we must teach with paper and pencil. Teaching with tablets and laptops is good for times such as a pandemic, but now we are in better times. We can teach children with paper and pencil, unless online classes are needed for some pandemic-like conditions.

We must know that we have to prepare children to face the world as they graduate from school. We must teach them, but with care and caution, that AI can be harmful. As I always say, use VPNs and private networks to teach children in labs.

For homework, paper-and-pencil is a good option too. We live in advanced times, and AI-based evaluation is now easy and can be done online. Children can do the homework, and parents can upload the answer sheet, which can be evaluated online by AI tools the schools can buy from the market. It would be easy for teachers to get homework evaluations from AI apps. Teachers can focus on better illustrating tools of adult worlds, not limited to AI and Tech, but essentials. Teachers can focus on lab work, and lab assessments can also be conducted online using AI.

The following two things must be in your hands if you want to define what education for children means in these advanced age:

What to teach?
How to teach?

Yes, you can find more about it in my next newsletter on evaluations of children learning with AI.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Regards,

Support Trump, his allies and his supporters

In all these tough times, where it’s easy to believe the loudest in the crowd, know you need to hear the right ones. Know they will shout out loud, you won’t even know who you started to listen to.

President Trump is a right world leader on the stage to follow, listen to him, in his absence, there are other world leaders you can listen to who are his close allies, such as Sir Keir Starmer and President Macron (I know he is not famous for his strict views, but for some time stick to them).

The issue of today is in Iran’s hands himself. Iran enriched Uranium despite sanctions. This led to Operation Midnight Hammer last year. They did not stop. So, USA had to take action this year as well. This is the final call. Let’s solve this problem forever. Everyone wants Iran to give away its Nuclear dust and un/enriched uranium. The current possessions Iran has can make up 6–7 nuclear bombs. No one in the Middle East, including Gulf nations, wants Iran to own Nuclear weapons. This is what the fight is all about. Iran can destroy the world to its liking. So this war. Iran has to hand over this stuff and end the war.

In these tough times, remember who to listen too. You can get distracted by the loud noises. You are quite does not mean others are quiet too. And what you would hear would be loud noises only. So don’t trust sources that are not recommended. Trust only recommended sources, Trump and his allies.

This is a crucial time when the deal can be made, and the deal can be rejected. If a deal is made with Iran, we win; if it is not, then things will be different.

Know, the mission, why it was so, and know to follow President Donald Trump even with closed eyes, if you have issues, speak to him, his allies, he listens, they listen, he understands peoples problems, and he changes what is not right to people’s view. Talk to him / them if you have problems.

Same with Trump’s allies, supporters and Trump’s followers, listen to them, talk to them.

I am not asking you to be a dummy followers, you will get answers. But in tough times, when decisions are made, support is asked you need to take their side.

Take to side of Pred Trump, ask him who to look for answers, who to follow, when he is not around. Other world leaders who are his allies can be trusted as well, with a bold “yes”.

Know it well!

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Bye for now,

Warm regards,

….