Searching Revival in Nature

Today is Easter, the best day to talk about revival.

Revival means, “The return of something after a period of decline, inactivity, or obscurity.”

Revival has religious significance and these are true facts.

Revival also means “Bringing back an old work.”

We all have heard the Myth story of the bird “Eagle Revival”, where

  • This majestic bird an eagle.
  • It lives for years after going through revival.
  • When it feels its end is near, it revives itself, though through struggle.
  • Young again.
  • Flies again.
  • Lives a young life again.

Revival in Nature

Revival is seen in nature; we just need to see it.

Plants revive

Trees revive

See the spring season, when old leaves fall off, and the revival of trees with new buds is all over.

Note: This image is generated with chatGPT.

Revival happens!

Revival happens for good!

Revival is part of Nature!

Although the Eagle revival may be a myth/ story meant to encourage and inspire courage, these stories were created with a purpose by great men in the past.

Believe in these great words, men and women of courage wrote years and centuries ago.

Revival is part of life.

We can’t revive like a myth of eagle. The story was made for hope and inspiration.

But we can hope.

Hope is the biggest bud for revival.

Believe all would be well.

Hope all is well.

These are big tools by your side.

As spring passes, we see old leaves fall, and new ones come, and we see a revival in nature.

Religious revival is true fact.

Embrace the Gods’ wish with love.

Embrace the creation of the world with love.

Believe it would be well.

In the end, thank God for giving us life.

Thank God for making us a part of this process.

Thank God for giving us a chance to see revival in Nature.

Thank God for giving us the opportunity today.

Thank God and pray, Lord, for the revival of things we can’t change ourselves!

Thank you for reading.

Regards,

….

Happy Easter

Greetings everyone,

How are you doing?

May this day fill mankind with a positive outlook.

Let this day remind you for hope, belief and perseverance. Do believe and leave the rest unto God is my thoughts for today for you.

I wish you Happy Easter.

I cooked Egg Burger today with these sweet three eggs that I decorated.

Here is the recipe,

Subscribe to my cooking blog for such wonderful recipes, here

Happy Easter. I made Egg Burger Today. Here is Recipe.

Thank you for reading.

Thank you for your time.

Warm regards,

….

Fusion of Hollywood and AI — e.g., time travel to the future?

Summary: A lot still needs to be made, for example, “Time Travel to Future”. We do need love, fiction stories from AD 4, Rome or NY in 3010 AD. Humans may not be able to do it alone; AI can help. Sets and environment from AI, with real human actors. It would be win-win for both human actors and for AI. We need love stories from 3010 AD too, let’s make sets from AI and engage human actors in it, what a combination of the best. People won’t lose their jobs, and those watching can feel a sense of realistic work in front of them.

Hollywood is known for its excellence in movie-making. Hollywood hires all kinds of actors, from top actors on the front end to backend participants. But how much? How many?

  • Around 2.5 million people work in film, television, and related sectors. Can these working people retain jobs, if we make a fusion of AI and Hollywood.
  • This includes actors, directors, editors, writers, camera crews, artists, etc.
  • In the Los Angeles region (Hollywood’s core) roughly 700,000 jobs are tied to entertainment and media. This includes both direct jobs (production, studios) and indirect jobs (marketing, catering, logistics, legal, etc.).
  • Companies like Warner Bros, Universal Pictures, and The Walt Disney Company employ tens of thousands of people globally.

What would movie-making be like in an age when AI has excelled so much?

Have we reached all we humans could have made?

No, time travel to the past and future still lingers in human imagination and interests.

AI won’t back up.

People won’t want to leave Hollywood.

So we are at a juxtaposition.

What if AI is combined with modern techniques?

Time travel to the future can be nice, and it would have been impossible in modern Hollywood to make time travel work on its own.

Most shoots in such cases require significant investment in set construction.

Just like in the Barbie movie-making, when the “Pink” color was in short supply. Time travel to 50–100 AD, and to the future, say, 3010 AD, is possible now with AI. However, there can be real errors if we rely solely on AI actors.

Yes, in AI-only movies with no humans, there can be errors, but they could be fixed if a real Hollywood team joined the AI-made time or future travel.

Hollywood teams can do wonders if they embrace AI; after all, we have talked about so many stories. People will get new outputs with this merger.

Where would AI generate all these sets and backgrounds from? Pictures, photographs, and videos? Would they click their own, or would they take it from the internet? Copyright fees! Won’t it be nice to see Rome, “Pantheon” in its real form? The original one? Would they not read history books written by humans! Same with the future, how would “Pantheon” look in the future? Covered with artificial diamonds, just to give an example of human advancement by the year 3010 AD.

At the same time, this shall create jobs for technical personnel working on this matter.

And Hollywood would be able to retain its workforce.

A merger of AI and Hollywood: AI makes mistakes, and Hollywood just needs the sets of, say, 50 AD Greece or sets from flying cars and parking light vehicles, a building’s rooftop from 3010 AD.

Can AI create the sets, and you put in the human actors?

Why not?

AI shall give jobs to a new set of people. Or Hollywood would collaborate with a new set of technical people?

Are technical AI people not tired of editing movie-making with prompts?

Why not call in some real workers from Hollywood?

Can real actors work in an AI-simulated environment?

Time travel to Rome, AD 4? We need love stories from 3010 AD, too. Let’s create AI-generated sets and engage human actors in them.

Time travel to the future!

Why doesn’t Hollywood do something like this? Ask AI for sets, dresses, plans?

We need real people in the background; they are AI people in AI movies, call in real people. This should be a real collaboration.

Often, there are many mistakes in AI videos.

So why not time-travel Hollywood, why not space-travel with brightness of AI Hollywood, why not science-travel Hollywood? Why protests, embrace it. Ask for real people who work here. Just be ready, AI may change your environment, that is what we want, saving money on sets. No one will mind saving money on sets.

Time to join Hollywood! Not all AI in AI movies mixes real people, real words, and real voices; Hollywood actors need jobs, and AI can provide a Rome, AD 44 or NY 3010 AD set with little work.

More people to hire, as we humans want to see more in time travel to Rome, AD 44 and NY 3010 AD.

We want to see more of the things humans can’t direct on their own.

Yes, production costs are down for AI movies and AI advertisements.

But we need real people at work too, try that it would work wonders.

We want love stories from AD 44 Rome and NY 3010 AD, with the help of background and sets from AI, so that we don’t have to darken things we can’t do, and actors who can create the real magic in AI movie-making.

Can Hollywood alone design the New York Square of 3010 AD? Think!

So, it’s time for the fusion of both Hollywood actors, workers, and AI as a tech, AI people as the mode.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Regards,

….

It would be fine. Have Patience.

#life #future

The prizes are rising. Yes, but its temporary.

Be courageous, say you can deal with it. You can deal with it.

Don’t lose your hope but support.

Believe in God.

There is nothing in the world that happens without reason.

We would grow up stronger now.

Leaders know what you are going through. That is what is called a true leader. But right now, all they want is your support.

Today or tomorrow, it was needed.

It would be fine.

Prizes would come lower in some time.

There is no point in being anxious.

You are angry, but you didn’t understand the reasons.

Look back in history.

There was pain there too, we came out of it.

We would come out of it with courage.

Have patience, is what I say again.

It would be fine.

You should be afraid of AI taking away your jobs rather!

There are so many issues of concern.

It would be fine.

It would be fine.

This is temporary and for all set.

Gas prize.

Petrol prize.

We all know it.

We all hear it.

We all pay it.

We all feel it.

Have patience, but you can say your concerns, we have to bear some pains.

It looks like chaos! It does but it’s not! It would be fine!

But just look at the pains that it could have caused.

Be courageous, say you can deal with it.

God have their own way.

Everything happens for a reason.

Thanks for reading.

Have patience, is all I say.

Regards,

….

Work in the Age of AI. What would work be like!

Note: This is my work in duplicate copy. Link to original article: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26954.32960

-People would be unemployed just to be employed again.

-All this after understanding that complete AGI is not plausible.

-AI has to pass this time for people to understand limitations of AI.

-It would be decided in this time what AI can do what AI cant do.

-To know what AI to keep and what AI to stop.

– The steering is in our hands; we can stop the ship, we can change the direction of the sail. 

Keywords: AI, future, AGI, jobs, professions

Introduction

There is a lot of disruption in the world due to AI. AI has created job losses, professions are impacted from the roots out. Some praise AI, while others are hopeless, thinking about what direction to pursue now. Some feel as if they have reached a cliff where they know nothing of where to sail to now. People are losing their jobs rapidly, and those who remain in jobs feel the pressure to compete with AI. Everyone is busy scrolling through the latest AI courses to stay updated. People are working extra time so that AI doesn’t replace their jobs, from writing to decision-making, AI is replacing human intelligence.

Everyone is following the AI hype; those who are not are being given the letter with compensation. The business owners think AI will take over and they won’t need human employees, or would need fewer human employees. Well, what if something goes wrong, they would have to call human employees, then, but now contractual jobs are up too. People are looking for anything they can work on.

But the bigger question is — “Is the full AGI even possible?” Other questions are like, “Are there limitations of AI?” Other questions we shall answer in this article are: “What kind of jobs would AI lead to?”, “Can AI be dangerous?”, and “Can we steer the directions AI has to travel, deciding what is right and what is wrong?”

In the age of AI

People would be unemployed just to be employed again.

Job losses and a lack of vacancies are mounting across all departments worldwide. People are grappling with what to update now and which certification is needed. AI automates coding; coding jobs are automated. Coding was the most sought-after course in the world. Everyone was doing a technical degree in coding or computer science; all this is being automated by AI. Why, and why we don’t want to stop it. Coding requires long hours; it’s a nice and interesting profession, but even 5–10-year-olds are being taught to code. In many places around the world, schoolchildren were invited to coding hackathons. It was too much, childhood is not for coding. Maybe that is why AI is progressing in coding, and there is nothing wrong with it. We still need experienced coders to verify, debug, and fix major problems.

But apart from coding, there are professions that are losing jobs, such as analytics, where AI creates instant reports. However, all this would go on for some time. After that, regulations would be put in place. In the 1950s no one predicted coding would become such a big professions in the 2000s? Who knew? No one thought the whole world would train itself to be coders to write software and earn huge money! No one predicted it! In the same way, new professions would develop! Just as Textile engineering jobs ended and people found jobs in other sectors, new jobs would come. People would lose jobs to AI until, one day, jobs would start rising and then become constant, as shown in Figure 1 below. Note that this figure is based on human prediction, not AI, nor on actual data.

No one has seen the future, but this is how past waves of employment have worked out. Let’s see how the job market would revive. There are other technical challenges to watch for and address in the coming days.

AI has to fail this time for people to understand its limitations.

We have to progress a bit further to show that AI is harmful in many areas, while taking care of the harm it can cause. We need to take it a step further to identify which areas AI is harmful in; only then can we decide which AI to keep and which to stop. We have to move ahead, we have to use, we have to pass by this stage. We have to take small pains while being cautious about the harm it can cause. All this just to understand the consequences of uncontrolled AI use. We can’t stop now, as China is not stopping. But one day, a global consensus would be formed, as AI can be very dangerous if not controlled. At the same time, as AI advances, innocents should be protected from AI-related harm. As we grow in AI, we keep making rules to make AI safer. This would mould AI into a new form. If we look back from the future, we would see that the things and regulations put in place shaped the future of AI. Yes, small efforts yearly can shape the new AI, which some may still happily call AGI, as it would be intelligent but restricted. However, how would it be ensured that notorious players don’t bypass the rules and set up a secret AI laboratory, since all AI needs is a garage.

It would be decided at this time what AI can and can’t do.

For example, you cannot have a robotic machine with near-AGI capabilities. The reason is that robots would learn from the environment. Once it possesses an AGI-like mind and learns to navigate a new environment, no one knows how the robot will behave. No one knows how robots would make a world of their own. Hence, robots must be free from gen-AI yet possess basic conversational AI, as they need to converse with humans. Robots must not be allowed to congregate. We don’t want a “Terminator”- like scenario on Earth, so we need to stop after a while, and stagnation shall set in AI development. We can’t stop alone; world AI leaders like China have to make an agreement on this. We won’t do it; you don’t do it; otherwise we would stop, and Chinese robots would take over the world.

All this after understanding that AGI is not plausible.

One day, we will understand that a fully capable AGI is not plausible. Even if we try to make a complete AGI, AI would be so much regulated by then that a complete AGI won’t be talked off. It would be dangerous to create a fully capable AGI. Nothing to be scared of. All the regulations, year by year and month by month, are preventing us from achieving a perfect AGI. But no one promised that humans need complete AGI; we can work with our model of AI and happily call it AGI, since it would be intelligent enough for our needs. So why run for AGI, leaving other buttons open for mischievous acts? Why a perfect AGI? No, we are happy with what we have. Why burn so much energy to make a fully intelligent AGI that can think like the best humans ever thought of?

To know what AI to keep and what AI to stop.

In this era, we are working on what is being produced; we see it, use it, and then decide whether to keep it or dispose of it. There are so many options people have in the market, of which AI to use and which AI to drop. People are using AI on their own; no one is forcing them to. The AI industry is being driven by the people. And then people can’t say, we are not the players of AI. That AI is in the hands of a few. No, AI leaders use the fact to make some AI more advanced, especially the AI that people like, so people like it more, it is enhanced and the cycle continues. New features are added, people like them, then leaders either emphasize them more or drop them and backtrack on the most-liked AI feature. This is what determines which AI to keep and which to stop. The decision of big firm is based on majority rule. Most people use ChatGPT’s specific features, so it would enhance and pay more attention to them. While in markets like China, the rules are different, they want to lure outside users to their apps. Without much consideration of what people like or not, they want to grow worldwide. So, when the current owners of AI are deciding what to keep and what to stop, we need not worry; they are already taking majority votes into consideration. However, they must also consider minority needs. Governments can ask big players for this data to establish the same, and if this is not being done, they can take steps to stop some unused or harmful features of the apps.

Conclusion and Future Work

The steering is in our hands; we can stop the ship, we can change the direction of the sail. We have to go through these tough times; so many people are living in fear of losing their jobs, and so many fear getting new ones. All areas impacted by AI. But what and where is the world leading now? As I said, steering is in our hands. The big tech and big AI companies look at us, the people, and see what we look for in AI. They develop features and invest more in what we like to do online. The big AI leaders look at what most people on Earth want to do with AI, and we are being taken into account. Apart from that, in the future, governments will take more action against harmful AI. Apart from that, robotics with AGI can be dangerous, who can forget the “Terminator” movie series? Who says we want to get the perfect AGI, no we don’t want a perfect AGI! We would stop just right before that step; we have to.

1. They Met

Hi, in my blog as always you ll find stories, global issues and some glimpses of my research work in AI. Here are some more stories, hope you enjoy.

Note: All characters in this story are imaginary and fictional. This is a fictional story. It does not relate to anyone living or passed away. In case it relates, then it’s just mere coincidence.

She loved her younger brother so much that it could not havebeen described. Their features also matched to some extent. They grew up together, entwined in love. She was very possessive of Jack Marshel, her younger brother. She used to teach him all subjects after school, and in his free time, they would play games. Games ranging from the teacher teaching on the board to hotel-hotel, as they used to call it, or running games in their huge garden. 

 

Well, this does not mean their nature is the same; no, they are opposite indeed. She likes to keep quiet, while Jack loves to talk, run around, have parties, and have a lot of fun. Indeed, Jack is always searching for an agenda for some, or even a little, fun. While Jem Marshel, yes, this is her name, she likes being quiet and in symphony with nature. Still, the brother and sister were in love with each other, the best sibling love anyone would have seen in ages. Both are ready to go a long way for each other. Jem cares deeply for her brother Jack, and Jack cares for her. Who knows the future?

 

Jack was 24 now, and he was in love with a woman who was 23; her name was Cindy Froprok. Cindy was like Jack, fun-loving, extroverted, and a social butterfly. Cindy was an average-looking woman, but overall smart enough to catch Jack’s eye, whom she consulted on every decision, even inadulthood. However, because Cindy was social, many men approached her for her hand. She was smart, she was rich, and she was clever. Jack worked in an analytics firm, earned a nice living, and was from a well-to-do family. Jack was too handsome to be ignored, and this kept Cindy coming back to Jack. Jack defined masculine looks naturally; his biceps, eyes, beard, and temperament all appealed to Cindy. Cindy was surrounded by so many men, but she longed only for Jack. Those years have passed by, and Cindy is still waiting for Jack’s proposal. She had given Jack enough hints about it that she wanted to settle, that her family wanted her to marry, as she belonged to an orthodox family. But Jack always kept quiet; he never explained to Cindy what was keeping him quiet. Why didn’t he propose to her or go out on a date with other women? 

 

“Brother”

“Brother”, Jem spoke loudly, but Jack was busy doing the puncture of his new car. 

“Jack, can you hear me?” He was still busy fixing the tire.

“Jacky,” as she used to call him.

“Yes, my Jem, my sister, why are you shouting?”

“You don’t hear, then you call it shouting, bro! What’s up with you?”

“Just give me a moment…”

“No, talk to me first.”

“Ok, Ma’am, now what have I done? Did I eat extra pasta? I thought I left enough for you?”

“No, it’s not about pasta Mom made.”

“Then?”

“Cindy!”

“Cindy, what about Cindy? What happened?”

“You know you are not attending her calls.”

“Oh, you see, I was busy with the car today, it was Sunday, and anyway, she has a lot of people to talk to.”

“You know she longs for you?”

“Me!”

“Oh yes, whole Brokeshine knows it.”

“She has a lot of friends; I can be replaced if I don’t talk to her.”

“No, it’s not like that, Jacky.”

“What is it?”

“She called me thrice since morning, asking you not picking  up her calls?”

“Man, I have been in the car since morning, you know that, are you too seeing it?”

“I told her, you know, she likes to talk to you every three hours, even I know this.”

“Oh, sis, I’ll talk to her, let me finish this, wash my hands, and change my clothes then?”

“No talk to her first!”

“Sis, you are too much!”

“What did you guys fight?”

“No”

“Then what is the problem?”

“She wants to marry.”

“Marry! She is just 23 now.”

“I am saying this only.”

“What are you saying?”

“She is from an orthodox family, they say it’s getting late to marry.”

“Oh, so, but..”, Jem hesitated to speak more.

“Yes, that is why I am allowing her space to talk to other men.”

“Come on, whole Brokeshine knows you both are dearest love birds, who can’t be separated.”

“Yes, I am giving her the opportunity to explore other men.”

“But why?”

“As I can’t marry her now, it’s too early!”

Jew was struggling to speak now. She waited for a while, there was complete silence, and then she spoke, “Are you doing this because of me?”

“Yes, my sister, I love you the most.”

“But why don’t you do this? You are both made for each other.”

“I want to see you with someone who is made for you first.”

“It would take time, you know, I am not out of my last affair, which left me devastated.”

“Last affair, forget him, he was a …”

“You know I can’t forget him.”

“Jem, forget him, and move on, till you move on, I can’t.”

“Jack”

“Yes, I don’t want to leave you behind and move into a new world on my own; you are my sister.”

“Jack dear, wait.”

“No, wait, I have told Cindy I can’t marry her till you, Jem, my dear sister, marry someone nice.”

“I don’t want to marry Jack, you know.”

“Then don’t ask me to marry Cindy or anyone else. You are 30 now; if I marry before you, you shall never get a match for you in this community, you don’t travel outside.”

“Jack, I need time to think over. While Cindy is being pressurized by her family to marry a gentleman who works in the wood business and earns more than he does.”

“If she were meant for me, she would wait.”

“She can’t wait; her family, you know that.”

“I have a man in my eyes for you, Jem. He is nice, good-looking, earns decent if not more, and jolly; he is too jolly.”

“Jack”

“Look, either we both are marrying on the same date, or we both are not marrying.”

“Jack”

“No, Jack or anything, if you don’t marry, I can’t leave you like this.”

“Wait, I’ll call him to come over, he is in town, he is on a traveling job, he is the country manager of Qumsome. He checks the regional managers around the country; that is his job.”

“Regional manager, how much does he earn?”

“Qumsome is a small company, so he doesn’t earn that well, but his heart is of gold.”

“Come sit on my bike, I’ll take you to his guest house, he is in town. If you want to help me and Cindy marry him.”

Jem had no option. She sat on their bike and went to meet him in his guest house. 

“It’s Sunday, I am home, nice to meet you, Jack, how are you?”

“Hi”

“She is my sister, Stephen.”

“Hi Stephen”

And they met for the first time.

Contravertial Elon Musk’s new device- Here is why! Much more than AI Docs Apocaloptimist!

#ai #future #futurist #technology

AI apocaloptimist — This device is the real danger.

It can hack humans.

What I am referring to is this Technology that can hack humans, and it’s not AI. It’s not AGI, you all are fighting over.

Do you want Technology to write your social media? Yes, instead of you doing it? No, not AI!

Do you want Technology to reply to your emails? Yes, instead of you doing it? No, not AI!

Do you want Technology to tell you fake news and make you believe in things you don’t want to? If we see fake news, we can use our brains to detect whether it’s fake, but not if this Technology takes over human brains!

Elon Musk’s new device is being called a revolution in the telecommunications industry.

This device can take orders from your brain to accomplish tasks. This brain data can be collected and patterns can be identified, this can be used in harmful ways to hack mankind. We are free humans created by God not robots in hands of technology.

Why allow a device to decide what you want to see, hear, or write on the internet, leave aside on social media?

Have you watched #THE AI DOC: OR HOW I BECAME AN APOCALOPTIMIST? This documentary is nothing compared to the new device Elon Musk wants to spread around the world.

AI can be sought right, but this can’t be sought.

Humans can be hacked by this way of life. We can open our car gates on our own; we don’t want to use our minds to direct a punching card in our pockets to open our car doors. Are we that lazy? That we rent our brain waves?

We are human; we do have some spiritual content within us, and we are not robots that need to be tied to such technology.

Ok, you want internet free all over the world. They can give us the internet, but we want our devices. We want to operate on our device with our hands, not leak our thinking patterns to a server. We don’t want to be hacked!

Unless the disabled to whom this device can be a help. However, AI can help them too.

Why go this far?

Why rent your brain to a private company if you are not physically at margin?

It can be understood from the video here that it would use your mind waves to take commands.

Elon Musk changes the game again with a device that works anywhere on Earth.

Do you want technology to write your social media?

Do you want technology to reply to your emails?

This device is far more ahead than #AI_DOCs in the Apocaloptimist scenario.

This device can provide internet access, so why not ask it to act as a hotspot for your mobile devices?

It may cost around $800.

Yes, we need the connections in mountains, in deserts, and in the sea, but we don’t want it to operate on brain waves or without our typing, or our speaking unless some are disabled from doing so.

Give us internet connections, if you can. But we don’t want an internet connection that has to operate our brains!

In either case, we don’t want our thoughts to run our phones, reply to our messages, and auto-run our emails.

It’s a controversial experiment on mankind. First test it on other species. Let’s see what monkeys want from AI. Let us test it on chimpanzees. Let’s see if chimpanzees can get the banana inside the car by opening the door with their thoughts. Can we control these chimpanzees then with our orders? Can we make these monkeys who were tested as our pets then? Can these chimpanzees follow our orders then?

What are the side effects on thinking then?

Would humans ever be able to innovate then?

Is it not a form of human hacking!

For the disabled, solutions are coming. Have faith and trust; you can use these devices to a limit, and switch off from them when not in need.

Don’t allow your brain to be mapped.

Be a free human as God has created us to be.

It’s more dangerous than AI as in “THE AI DOC: OR HOW I BECAME AN APOCALOPTIMIST.”

AI can be controlled, but once your brainwaves are lost to tech like this, humans can be hacked.

It’s more than surveillance.

Once patterns of human thought collected by these devices are learned by AI, humans can be commanded.

Forget recommendations systems that you say is collecting data, all that is small fight.

AI apocaloptimist — AI is not that dangerous; it can be corrected, but this technology can be the real danger.

In short, give us the internet, and we will figure out how we want to open our car doors with thought or with physical movement.

However, once again, this is good for the disabled, and new solutions are coming. Just give time.

Reference

[1] Elon Musk changes the game again with a device that works anywhere on Earth.

Support me in this.

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Time to limit Robotics from using AGI and Advanced Conversational AI

#ai #future #futurist

Summary: We need limitations on robotics, so we need to put restrictions on how robots can use to be “AGI”. Yes, limitations on robotics and its interaction with to be “AGI”. If we stop, would China too stop?

We need work to be done.

At the same time, we want equality at work. Some works are not considered equal, and some no one wants to do. Everyone wants equality at work.

Everyone wants dignity at work.

Let’s keep conversational AI separate. In subsequent write-ups, I shall discuss what, how and why conversational AI can be kept separate.

We need robots for locomotive work.

We need robots for mechanical work.

We need robots for work not meant for humans.

Robots are just machines. Machines that require extensive training to perform their scope of work.

But the scope is wide.

Still, we need limitations on robotics, so we need to put restrictions on how it can use AGI. Yes limitations on robotics and its interaction with AGI.

Robots exist as opposed to chatbots.

Robots have an aim against a chatbot.

We need each robot to have a specific aim and a name mentioning its aim.

Say, Grasscutting Robot Robu21, can be the name of a community garden robot.

We can live without AGI chatbots, but not without physical work that needs displacements, which humans can’t do at times. This in no way means there are no human jobs; no, it just means the right to do dignified work.

So let’s separate to be AGI and Advanced Conversation AI advances from Robotics.

Robots do need conversational AI to understand what humans want.

Means we don’t want robots for chats; we want robots for work.

Either bring groceries from the store or fix that garden rolling machine. Or see and inspect a metriods shower. Specialized robots for specialized tasks.

We don’t need sophisticated talking machines.

We need a robot that can understand what we say, without extra chats.

We want robots that are well-behaved.

We want robots that can do work.

And they can be box robots or humanoid robots. It depends on what people want? Not what I want!

What it means is we need robots in the community, say, for cleaning roads of spring leaves and clearing snow off the highways on a blizzard day.

We need robots for so many things.

But we need to separate AGI-based AI, which some call AI God, from essential robotics.

We are in short supply of workers in many places, including Germany.

At the same time, we need rules, guardrails, and to-dos for robots.

We don’t want a robot that punches a human child or even an adult. So, wait, who produced that robot? We need nice robots! Robot manufacturers, please note this!

We want nice robots that can work and also entertain the world as they clean up the roads after fallen trees.

As we progress in the future, we will need some robots for public services. For example, if we had some robots, airports wouldn’t have been seeing long queues. This does not mean we need to take jobs from humans. No, it’s just backup.

Robots are just backups.

As soon as the climate is back, your jobs are back, robots are back in their wooden boxes you made for them.

A climate calamity comes in, and we call in all community robots to help. And they would be taught this way.

Also, the conversational AI is going too far; we don’t want all aspects of it to be robotic for now. Do we?

So let’s separate the displacement work Robots shall do from AGI-based AI.

However, some people would like to have both; for example, Albania appointed Diella, a robotic minister who does both, but that is just to be AGI with a body! Yes!

This article does not mean AGI is not essential; it has its uses, be optimistic. The people handling it would know what responsibility they have in their hands.

If we stop, would China too stop? Did you saw Chinese latest marvel in Robotics, the dances their robots do? Their sword dances? Can you compete with China?

Time to think!

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Regards,

….

Should Robots be on Facebook? Insta? Updates and Entertainment from Robots!

#ai #future #futurist

Should robots be on Facebook in the future?

Robots shall always be owned by a human owner. But do we want them to be on Facebook? For a robot in a factory, get to your owner if you want to read this article.

Would every entry of a robot that is guarded and marked by blockchains be on Facebook as well?

Would these entries on their accounts be made by them when registering on blockchains, or would their owner do it? Who would own such smart robots? Would it be a threat to mankind? That thing we all need to think together, but for sure, robots would start to compete for entertainment then.

They say who use Facebook these days?

So, maybe on TikTok!

Some really funny posts from your robots?

Robots are made to do your work, which other people can’t do for various reasons!

So can your robot entertain you and the world, too?

People like to share their thoughts, and robots shall be part of their lives in the future!

Can your robot take part in TikTok competitions for the most impressive robot?

Or something like the most entertaining robot!

Wait, AI is banned for children!

So, is the internet, so your children can’t see how good your robot is on Facebook!

But wait, your robot can be a genius too!

Entertaining as well as functionally well!

Serious at work, sincere in completing tasks, and then enormously entertaining in acts.

But who owns the FB or TikTok accounts of a robot?

Who will upload these?

Well, what would be the category of the robot on its FB profile?

Maybe a new entry in the gender category? Male/Female/Other/Robot?

But know well, robotics is not at that stage as of now!

Robotics is nascent now!

So robots, as of now, can’t handle their own FB accounts! They should not as of now!

So, no robot is entertaining you on FB! or TikTok! None as of a few years from now.

This is a futuristic view!

Yes, one day robots may be able to understand social media and operate on it!

One day, they may take your pics on their screens.

One day, they may take selfies with you.

And one fine day, the First Robot in the world may post its first post on FB!

That day, we will say, robots will entertain the world, apart from just doing their jobs!

But the question remains open! Should robots be on social media?

Would being on social media distract robots? No, they are meant to learn more and do more!

Robots can’t be distracted in the future. As they learn to do more, they are there to automate some work in places like, say, Germany, which is facing shortages of people to work.

At the same time, entertainment would be an added advantage.

Can we make friends with other robots? Well, what do you think of this? Making friends with a neighbour’s robot? “No, you are luring my robot to your home? Why don’t you be happy with your robot unless I want to sell my robot?” This would be my reply.

Can we allow robots to be friends? Well, no, we don’t want a world owned by robots; we want a world owned by humans. So we should disable robots becoming friends with robots, as a human safety measure.

We want a world of harmony in which robots do work that humans can’t do or shouldn’t do.

We would accept entertainment from robots.

But we should not accept friendship between robots.

However, we can accept cooperation among robots to accomplish tough tasks such as climate-related measures, firefighting, or other calamities.

So, the question is still open! Should we allow robots to be on FB? Insta? TikTok?

Who would make an account for them? And who would access it? Should we or should not we? Vote time!

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Regards,

….

Who are MiddleMen in AI Cycles? Can it be a future profession?

Who are MiddleMen in AI?

The one who made something out of their intellectual or productive capabilities and is neither at the front end nor at the delivery end of AI products.

The AI cycle can be understood as the progression from the inception of a prompt to the AI’s responses.

The AI can generate a lot from the internet and other databases.

Some AI pays news companies for information, but news companies are not MiddleMen; they are companies, and they can survive through deals they make with AI companies.

But MiddleMen are like you and me, who write, create, paint, or capture photographs that go unnoticed.

AI infrastructure and processes, and the reliability required to scale the systems, are not free.

But that does not mean MiddleMen should go unnoticed and unpaid.

For example, some MiddleMen devices, a new term for a gen, say, A characteristics.

Someone prompts it.

AI looks at it in on internet and summarize, edit, modertate, paraphrarse it and provides the output to the user. More users query this. The AI collects and combines points from other MiddleMen and answers the queries.

Should the MiddleMen be paid for this?

In case it becomes popular and trends on AI apps!

If so, how?

Is money enough?

Or is recognition needed?

I think a combination of both!

Why not link the reference to the original articles?

Why not backtrack and locate the original article, which was paraphrased and reconstructed?

MiddleMen makes AI too, it’s not just news companies, individuals too help it!

But what would someone have to do to be a MiddleMan for life?

Some small amount?

Or pay as it hits the query?

Or advertisements?

Another example: someone created a new painting of an alien that many people like.

And this painting is used often now.

So, this person gets famous, what about other versions?

What about other artists?

This is a point to understand.

As not everyone’s work would become so popular, and not all work would be recognised.

We need effective backtracking algorithms to assess the semantic similarity to AI-generated content. In case it trends, a reference must be provided.

As AI summarizes, it creates bullet points and refines the information to the point that it is unrecognizable.

Would AI buy platforms where people can log in?

Would AI read human writing techniques and write on their own, merging two or more stories? Would the original go unnoticed? Should this be ethically right?

All this, given that AI is a utility we are used to now, is needed.

Data is nothing without utilities for using it.

AI itself has to pay huge bills for its infrastructure and processes to provide you with things in such a concrete form. But that does not mean not to pay a MiddleMan.

Can being a MiddleMan in AI be a profession of the future?

Towards a better world.

Towards a world that does justice.