Can humans replace Robots in jobs? 

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11258.56008

Note: This is a duplicate copy. The original is on authors webpage.

          

Abstract – In today’s world, there are many robotic endeavours, some focused on intelligence and others on personal robotics. Let’s call the intelligent robot with an AI brain an AI robot, while other robots are called personal robots or manufacturing robots. Intelligent robots enhance human intelligence by analyzing data intelligently with the help of LLM and generative AI. However, personal robots perform tasks that no other profession has done before, such as personal care. Celebrities have chefs and cooks, but common people are seeking personal robots to make coffee and perform similar tasks. Would humans want to do this work that robots want to take in the future? It may seem odd to make someone’s coffee, but some chefs do it. Another issue is the validation of authority—usually, that is the job of the person assigning tasks. But would humans want to do this kind of work with care for other humans and, in the end, enjoy a coffee themselves? Would it be a respectable job? What is it that home robots do best? Can we beat robots? Would other professions bounce back as well? Would other jobs bounce back as well?

 

 

I.                   Introduction

Numerous robots are being developed by various Robotics and AI companies. But why? What are they targeting? Who would buy these robots? And if someone buys these robots, what would these robots be used for? Are they out of sci-fi stories?

It’s time to think about why this is happening. Why the robotization of the world? Why do we see demos of robots of different kinds everywhere? At some places, robots are serving food in restaurants, while in other places, they serve coffee in meetings, and in still other places, they work in warehouses. Yes, robots working in a warehouse do repetitive work. There are different kinds of robots. In manufacturing, robots are used for making, packaging, shipping, loading, and unloading of raw or processed materials. This appears to be a monotonous job, characterized by repetitive tasks. Some jobs are risky and should be replaced by robots, while others are mundane and highly specific to a particular procedure; any change in procedure may require the robotic machine to be reset or reprogrammed. This has been replacing humans in recent years. Warehouse robots scan barcodes and transfer packets to the correct location, then ship them to the designated destination. These robots are non-humanoid and have largely replaced humans. However, these non-humanoid robots are sensitive to changes in many things. However, have humans reached the pinnacle of development, and are more changes not needed? Is it so? If so, such robots are here to stay; if not, humans would likely be called in again for manufacturing and warehousing. 

Next, there are other types of robots, such as humanoid robots, which resemble humans and are often overhyped. Any small news on humanoid robots comes on news channels. Many major companies are developing humanoid robots. But is it right to have robots that resemble humans so closely, living alongside them? At the end of the day, they are machines. And why do people want them? Well, no one asked people if they wanted it, it’s a hype as I said. It was like Branded Phones used to be. People are amazed to see them and know more about their workings. But why are they selling then? What is the selling point?

Another type of automation is the automation of knowledge discovery, facilitated by LLMs and gen-AI-based bots. I have written numerous sci-fi articles on robotics myself, but they were labelled as sci-fi. These are different from verbose AI, where machines speak the instructions. That is mainly for clear understanding and is better than pushing complex washing machine button combinations. So, verbose AI is not robotics; it’s a feature that enables machines to understand what humans want in naïve language. I did not tag this as sci-fi, and these are futurist machines. These are machines, not robots. 

Let’s explore what robotics has to offer in Section II and the reasons for using robots in Section III.

 

II.                 What are robots?

Robots are intelligent machines that perform actions typically done by humans. They possess some locomotive abilities and may or may not resemble humans.  

 

There are four kinds of robots, as explained below.

1.      Personal robots

Personal robots are owned by human(s). They work for a specific task of the human(s) who own them. These robots can be trained and made to learn what humans want.  They have designated work for home automation, which includes filling the dishwasher, making morning coffee, to name a few.

 

2.      Manufacturing robots

These robots work in manufacturing, for example, in the production of cold drink bottles. These robots help generate products fully or in parts. These robots can also be used in warehouses, where significant automation has been implemented to replace human jobs. Some of the jobs performed by robots are not human-friendly, and some are also hazardous.

 

3.      Humanoid robots

These robots can perform any of the above tasks, but they resemble humans. They stand and walk like humans do. They have two hands, two legs, and their face look like humans. They wear clothes like humans do. Are you not feeling it to be like a sci-fic like reality coming to our lives. Something like the Terminator movie? Do we want it? Some companies are training robots using real-time VR glasses and remote operations to enable them to learn in real-time.

 

4.      All-purpose robots 

All-purpose robots are robots that can perform a wide range of tasks. There are companies that are developing robots capable of performing a variety of tasks. They can work outdoors, indoors, and in various settings, including talking, playing, and caring for people. Typically, they look like humanoid robots.

 

These things are developed as humans reach a cliff, a part of life where everything seems to be leading nowhere. What was sci-fi was something people turned to and started automating. Hence, the need for robot manufacturing came in.

 

What are robots, such as an AI robot minister and a robot CEO?

Not all of us need robots; governments, however, need intelligent AI to assist them. Some people have given a face and a name to this AI, calling it a Robot, but the correct term for it is AI Robot. Most intelligent robots deployed in government and organizations have a name and a face to show what AI can work for them. This is AI that works there. These intelligent AIs, whether a CEO or an AI minister, have a complex neural network that addresses inputs from company or government files and interprets the answers intelligently using gen-AI. With time, they grow more mature and hence help in decision-making. But this is not what a personal robot is like. 

The home robots, too, have AI, but they typically do the same tasks. And what are the tasks? In the next sections, we explore why we need robots and whether humans can replace jobs currently held by robots.

 

 

III.               Why do we need robots? 

But how do humans replace robots’ jobs? To understand this, let’s examine why we need robots. 

What are robotic companies aiming for with robots?

Well, it’s personal robots that are on hype! A robot that can make coffee. A robot that can set the bed, a robot that can cook for Maggie, and a robot that can wrap the dishes in the dishwasher. These are prime tasks that robotic companies are targeting. And it is so! People want this the most. Some people envision a robot that can assist with shopping. And it’s extremely expensive to afford a robot, so it can become a status symbol in the future.

What about the AI minister—well, that is a special machine with a face, which uses advanced AI, such as LLM and gen AI, to answer questions. It does not cook or perform other physical activities, unlike a humanoid robot. It can cook if you want to challenge it, but let’s leave it as it is. It is a face and a computer that works to learn what to do best. These are just machines talking, recognizing, analyzing, and responding in a human-like way.  The memory of the machine, which functions as a CEO or leader, is enhanced by the inputs it receives and shapes the Neural Network of the robotic AI machine. This is not robotics; it’s AI, although it may resemble robotics. These are entirely different perspectives on things. These are highly costly robots as they process and compute very complex data. Common people in the world do not need such complex systems. What if every person on Earth wants a robot with a Neural Network that can be customized according to their preferences? Just like an AI minister? Well, it would be expensive and energy-consuming, and typically, humans don’t undertake such complex tasks as running an organization or a country, giving their suggestions.

 

So, what about people? Do people want personal humanoid robots? Or animal robots? Well, it’s all sci-fi influenced. I myself write sci-fi at times. Although such robots are costly, they require extensive training. Recently, a company delivered a humanoid robot that was manually operated by a human from another room.   Is all this learning a waste? No, we do need some robots for sci-fi realities, such as landing and living on an asteroid, a moon, or Mars. Performing work in epidemic/pandemic-like situations. These studies are fine in research labs. But do common people need a robot each? We are not there yet! 

 

Well, why do we want robots? Let us understand this in detail.

 

IV.             Can humans replace personal robots?

 

Most personal robots are focused on early morning tasks, including waking up, preparing early morning coffees, breakfast, and lunch, loading dishwashers, and putting clothes in washing machines, as well as learning to operate washing machines and coffee machines.  These robots are being made in huge numbers. 

These are being trained in both remote operation mode and camera action vision mode. If they come to market, they will be bought by so many people. They may help, but they can malfunction too. The service cost would be high, maintenance of robots would be high as well. Apart from the high buying price of around $30,000 on average. 

What are these jobs?

Who does these jobs as of now?

No one does these jobs. These jobs are personal work.

We can do office work, but we are always seeking help in making morning coffee. This is why we need a robot to make morning coffee for us, especially on a cold winter day.

Can humans replace these jobs?

Humans have never done this job before.

No one hires others for this job.

No human has the guts to ask another human to make early morning coffee for another human.

If such a job comes up, then?

How much would you pay for the cordial person who makes you morning coffee? 

Would you treat them well?

Would you care for them?

Would they be considered your employees?

And the warmth they bring with them? It won’t be the warmth of a robot.

Can we have this as an app! Just like we have an Uber app for car rides. But can we hire them and give them assurance of a steady income? Something like a permanent role? From a new app: Robot versus Humans? 

But why would anyone make you coffee and set your personal things?

That is the question, and that is the point why robots are being made, as no one wants to do personal things.

What if we make a profession out of it?

Can it be professional?

Can it have professional standards? In case people want to do?

It is already a profession, but it is typically reserved for celebrities, who often have their own personal chefs and more.

Who’ll make coffee for them then? You? When you are awake? Maybe their shift time are different! 

Look at the warmth it would bring.

Maybe you can get more than just a coffee from them?

 

V.              Conclusion & Future Work 

Mankind is continually learning in a world of changing technologies and times. Humans analyze things, and many are perceived through human intellect. Human brains are open to sensing sci-fi facts, and in this way, they document them. Sometimes, humans fall in line to implement sci-fi ideas. This leads to confusion, fear, and unpredictability, but sometimes it is for the better. Some of this sci-fi we need, and much of it we do because our competitors, like China, are doing it. We know China is developing robotic armies, so we must do the same. But in the long run, would China sell one robot to each household? We know that China sells its products at prices well below manufacturing costs to generate popularity, market and in the end make profits. So, what should we do next? 

Should humans apply for jobs that robots are intended to do, or would robotics take over the world? Well, I say wait and see. Personal chefs and personal cooks are the realities of celebrities; what if everyone could live this dream? Personal coffee makers? But would you give your house keys to just anyone? No, so the process must be set. Authentications must be done. People must be verified by the app maker who hosts these skills. These are personal skills, and verification can be provided by the authority for such work. This would be characterized by highly paid jobs.

Note that we do need AI to assist with crucial tasks, but remember that AI can also be hidden behind a robotic face, giving it a name and a persona. This neural network of a named AI robot can be improved to learn the latest developments in technology or politics, or both, to aid in intelligent decision-making. There is still much to be done in AI.

Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Salary: Would he buy half the Earth’s Processes in the coming times?

November, 2025! 

Elon Musk is the world’s richest man.

Now on track to become the world’s first trillionaire.

The largest salary in the records.

Is it about control, not about money? Does that mean who controls the world processes?

Tesla asked its shareholders for their votes on this matter as it plans to grow.

People were asked if they believe Elon Musk can take Tesla further ahead in growth.

 

People have forgotten how Musk performed in the first half of 2025 as a member of the federal government delegation he was a part of.  He fired numerous federal employees in a non-cordial manner by a harsh surprise email, in addition to other decisions. Musk was the head of the Department of Government Efficiency at the time.

66.9% supported Musk’s salary of $1 trillion. Some reports indicate that he has accumulated 75% of the votes.

$1 trillion could be amassed in the next decade.

How much money would be left with Tesla then, after paying a trillion to Musk?

This means people don’t want to lose Elon Musk as the face of Tesla, and a strong brand name closely ties Elon Musk and Tesla.

However, this does not happen automatically. For this to happen, Tesla needs to reach a market value of several trillion dollars.

Millions of vehicles are to be produced annually, along with millions of robotaxis and Optimus robots.

Plus, performance targets.

He has to achieve certain benchmarks in Tesla, Optimus, and robotaxi growth as well.

Endorsed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey. As Dorsey says, it’s about “principled approach.”

The board believes that his name is closely associated with products like Tesla and Optimus, so losing him could lead to a loss of focus on these products.

On getting approval Musk was happy and danced with 2 robots on stage, citing it’s an altogether new book they are writing.

They say Musk wants control over the robot army he has to build; well, that won’t be right, as seen in what he did with the DOE of the federal government. 

They say that a third of Tesla’s value can be attributed to him, as this wouldn’t exist without his name.

Is Tesla afraid of what would happen if Musk leaves Tesla? Does Tesla think it can’t get a better CEO?

But what does he do with his money? He stays simple, dresses simply, with nothing much to notice. So, why does he want so much money? 

 

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Toumai Surgical Robot- A name to remember in Robotic Technologies

Robotics in action

MicroPort MedBot announced that worldwide commercial orders for the Toumai Surgical Robot have exceeded 100 units. Toumai Surgical Robot 80 units are already installed. This achievement establishes Toumai as the top Chinese-developed endoscopic surgical robot, marking a record in Chinese Medical Robotics expertise. April 2025, Toumai becomes the world’s first surgical robot to receive regulatory approvals for some surgeries. 

MedBot deals with research in robot ontology, control algorithms, engineering, “image-based navigation, and precision imaging.” MedBot robotic-assisted surgical system has exceeded 130 orders.

Toumai is a robotic system that assists surgeons in performing various procedures, including prostatectomies, nephrectomies, and hysterectomies. This is done with tiny incisions with endoscopic instruments and (virtually controlled) robotic arms. The term “robotic system” refers to the complete setup, not just a part of it.

Image from:https://www.medbotsurgical.com/en/news/270.html

These days AI means gen AI to people. But once robotics was a part of AI. Here, we discuss how robotic surgeries are helping people worldwide. Telesurgery is a form of remote surgery where a surgeon controls robotic instruments from a distant location to operate on a patient.

 

Robotic surgery offers easier access to high-quality medical procedures in remote places. This requires doctors who are adept in technological advancements, global collaboration, and the latest innovations. Sometimes, patients are so ill that they cannot be sent to a specialist elsewhere. This leads to remote, robotic treatments, where patients can choose remote surgery options if they prefer a technical doctor over a non-technical one.

 

 

Why do we need remote surgeries?

When we can’t reach a doctor in time, remote surgeries are often a good alternative.

But are we there? Are we there with advancements in AI or Robotic surgeries? 

In places like the International Space Station, such robots can be very helpful. Let’s build systems with this in mind. Just like Sunita Williams was stuck in the Space Station for a long time despite her poor health, similar technology could assist in such situations. On Earth, progress is reaching every city, so we can have good healthcare everywhere. Robotics adds precision, and who knows—they might even reduce the workload for top surgeons. 

 

Some key events in the making of Toumai

 

October 2025, MicroPort MedBot robotic telesurgery was showcased, with doctors from Kuwait successfully performing three robotic telesurgeries using the Toumai Surgical Robot. They became the first female gynecologic oncology specialists worldwide to lead inter-hospital robotic telesurgeries.

 

October, 2025. In a collaboration, Hospital Nove de Julho (São Paulo) and Hospital Mae de Deus (Porto Alegre)  performed remote robotic surgery.  

 

In August 2025, three  surgeons in China used the same Toumai Endoscopic Surgical Robot  to perform telesurgeries for three patients in Kashgar, China, around  5,000 kilometers away from the surgeon.

 

July 2025,  Toumai first performed an intercontinental   liver cancer resection,  left hepatic lobectomy on a patient located more than 10,000 kilometres away in Hangzhou, China. Around 2500 surgeons watched the procedure. 

 

July 2025, Professor Rong successfully performed the world’s first low Earth orbit satellite-based remote robotic surgeries using the Toumai® Mobile Surgical Platform.

 

In April, Europe’s first robot-assisted telesurgery was conducted by a Belgian surgeon via a hospital-grade network.  With the Toumai endoscopic robotic system, a 34-year-old woman with recurrent cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia underwent a total hysterectomy.

 

November 2024 with the Chinese-made Toumai Robot, the longest long-distance surgery was a prostate cancer surgery performed from Shanghai, China, on a patient in Casablanca, Morocco, around  12,000 kilometers away. 

 

November 2024 – In Rome, Italy, Toumai Surgical Robot successfully performed a combined adrenal tumor and gallbladder removal surgery. The doctor performed this kind of operation for the first time, and it was a seamless procedure, as reported by the company. The operation was termed a master-slave operation and lasted 100 minutes with minimal blood loss, and no major complications were reported.

 

Between October 2023 and January 2024, Peking University First Hospital conducted 20 urologic procedures with the Toumai MT-1000 system. 

 

The history of robotics dates back to November 1, 2019, when a robot from MicroPort Medbot, a subsidiary of Shanghai MicroPort Medical (Group), completed a robot-assisted prostatectomy at Oriental Hospital of Shanghai.

 

The price of a Toumai laparoscopic surgical robot is not publicly available; however, it is estimated to be around $1.5 million, excluding importation, maintenance, and consumables. 

 

–Now serving over 20,000 hospitals.

–100+ countries.

–Gemelli Hospital in Italy has completed over 50 cases

— In Belgium, completed 100 cases.

–In Africa with four installations  500 surgeries have been performed.

–In India, Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital in India around 50 urology procedures completed.

–Regional training hub in Turkey for places around it.

 

More advancements in this area can be achieved when telesurgery and robotics operations are taught in medical colleges, with hands-on experience on non-human beings as part of intelligent training for upcoming budding doctors. This can increase the number of surgical procedures that can be addressed globally, not just in the region. 

Humanoid Robotics’ CEO? Flexible Learning! How can your robot be different from competitor robots?

Yes, if it’s the New York Mayor’s job, then we need a humanoid robot for it 😊

So why not hire a data head, which is a robot? Why can only the CEO and Operational head be robots? Can a robot find its way from fresher to managerial mode? Is robotic CEO Mika favouring robotic hires 😊

Well, it all depends on who made the robot. 

Does the robot have bias? 

What can the robot give us? 

Who can assist in the decision-making of the robot? 

What are the challenges Mika and Tang Yu, the Robotic leaders facing?

What to expect? General-purpose or Specialized robot?

How much time to train?  

Battery?  

Technology stack to build it?  

Delivery to the customer? 

Installation Tricks and Tips?

Do we even need robotics when jobs are already scarce?

 

General purpose or Specialized? What say? Let’s develop flexible computing in robotics.

Well, we all have some specialization, then why do we want to wait for general-purpose robots? The skills missing in a robot can be honed and downloaded, as I mentioned in my sci-fi series on robots. Download whatever feature you want the robot to have. Update the features you want the robot to have. We should have something like this. 

But avoid reprogramming? Relearning to be supported!

General-purpose robots- A Jack of all things is not an easy thing?  Let it take time till you deploy and learn with special-purpose robots.

There are two meanings of general-purpose robots—one is a robot that can perform all jobs in the world (the traditional definition), and the other is a robot that can handle any task assigned to it with different inputs (such as collecting water from a filter into bottles, whether in full light or dim light, or when the weather filter is moved from the kitchen to the lobby). This is a need for flexible computing in robotics. 

People can have two robots if they want more.

But why not fix specialized robots, making them flexible, and send them to market? Then, automatically improve on them. Let’s develop flexible computing in robotics.

While general-purpose features like ChatGPT, which know everything, can wait.

Let’s do it in a spiral way.

Spiral around and come back to the same task with a positive displacement the next year.

Home robots and office robots are separate.

Some examples of robotics in real life are:

1.      Robot Mika, at a Polish spirits company, Dictador. Developed by Hanson Robotics. It gives decisions free of personal bias.

2.      Robot Tang Yu as an Operational Head of the Chinese gaming firm NetDragon Websoft.

3.      Then there are Hybrid Leadership Models. Here, human leaders look at AI for analytics and assisting roles. This is also the use of AI at a high level. A robot can take on this role; why wait to become a CEO like Mika?

4.      In the end comes Data-Driven Decision Making: Similar context as above, just at a lower level. This can also be referred to as the use of AI in business decisions. A robot can take this position why wait to be Operational Head like Tang Yu. 

 

We are all unique individuals, with diverse aims and aspirations. We are not general-purpose know-it-alls, so why do we want our robots to be non-humanly? 

The main goal isn’t to achieve mechanical balance, which has already been done; we’re aiming for an AI robot. Let a versatile robot come its way. Until then, let’s use specialized robots, like home robots and office robots, or simply a robot that acts as a friend.

Therefore, robots that can generalize and learn from experience, such as personal robots, are needed before a full-scale, all-around robot becomes a reality.

The current robot chosen as CEO can be replicated by other companies if they purchase it from the same company, such as FIGURE AI, NEO, or similar. The hardware is the same, the algorithms are the same, so what differs then? On-the-job training, trade secrets, and the knowledge gained. Are you training our robots for all this? Then all robots would be unique, just as unique as you and I.

 

Thank you for reading.

To be continued…

Subscribe for updates.

Know who Zohran Mamdani is who won in New York Mayor Race 

Who did people choose? 

 

Andrew Cuomo was not that far away but did not win the race, Mamdani did.

Mamdani, who belongs to an Indian Bollywood family on his mother’s side and an Indian academic (and Ugandan) on his father’s side. 

His mother is Mira Nair, a renowned Indian film director. One of the controversial movies Mira directed was Kama Sutra: A Tale of Love, released in 1996. She has around 21 films to her credit.

Mamdani comes from a very well-off family. Does he understand what it’s like to be poor? Does he look at rich people in America and never ask about rich people in South Asia? Does what he says apply in South Africa and South Asia as well? He might have gone to Film City many times I think, have you seen it? There are slums there too. You have attained a lot. What is your global picture, as New York is a global hub. Not just Africa, not just Asia but also from other parts of world. There are global people in America.

Mamdani was born in Uganda and went to South Africa when he was 5 years old. Then he was immigrated to the USA when he was 7 years old.  

Many people of Indian origin are involved in US politics, starting with the wife of Vice President JD Vance.

So, can we consider Mamdani to be of Indian origin? His father is an Indian Muslim, while his mother is of Hindu origin. It must be a respectably rich in cultural spectrum. Hence, he can easily see the migrant population in all spheres.

 

So, Mamdani’s slogan was something like, 

By the immigrants

For the immigrants 

And from the immigrants

Mamdani has strict views on Palestine and the people there.

He may not support Jewish protection, who knows, I wish he would give Jews protection.

Mamdani has very different views.

Well, people voted for him in New York, maybe because they think he can change things for them.

Maybe it’s just voter-wooing tactics.

Being from a film family I wanted to know how many movies has Mamdani watched?

Let’s see how it goes.

If you see, all he says is in perfect resonance with what people want to hear.

People are tired of the things they struggle with in their daily lives.

 

So, here comes what he can give, especially to immigrants.

He says to Trump in his victory speech, “To get to any one of us, you have to get through all of us.”  What a nice message to people.

I was certainly curious to know who wrote his lecture scripts.

He also added that they will make New York a city of immigrants.

It’s age that adds experience who’s experience he running with…

Well! 

I wish people Good Luck! 

 

What would the world have been like if there had been no AI?

A “what if” alternate. What if there were no AI?

What would life have been like?

What would professions be like then?

What would gadgets be like?

What would science be like?

What would culture be like?

Let’s explore what the world might look like today if there had been no AI — meaning no explosion of machine learning, generative models, or automation breakthroughs since AI was around.

Here are children learning coding in pre-AI boom era rather than learning Quantum in age without AI, and no AI tech savvy tutors. Can we spare children for cricket grounds and tell parents that all would be fine.

1. Technology and Economy

Slower innovation pace:
Many sectors, such as software, biotech, robotics, and fintech, would have been slower. Chatbots, recommendation engines, and autonomous systems would have been primitive. Many software programs would have matured to their maximum potential, leading to layoffs in the software industry, as the software had already reached its peak development. With code refactoring and bug fixes complete, the next step is to maturely release software products to new customers, if applicable. For services based softwares, maintaining a close relationship with application engineers with some front end and backend engineers is what would be left. Biotech would have been similar to software managed by humans. Robotics would have been without AI; anyone could tell what that means. Robotics is also part of AI, so let’s see that there won’t be many automation tools. Therefore, jobs in warehouses for manual work would have continued. 

No trillion-dollar AI race:
Companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and DeepMind wouldn’t exist in their current form. Big Tech (Google, Microsoft, Amazon) would likely focus more on traditional computing, cloud infrastructure, and data analytics rather than AI integration. Again, mature software may have led to layoffs. Now there is hope that we are building better products. One thing AI may have given us is hope that we have reached the end of the cliff, but there is still a way out.

Startups:
The startup ecosystem would still be driven by apps and platforms, similar to the early 2010s (think Uber, Airbnb, Instagram) — not AI-driven services, but rather basic services like commuting. Saturation would have reached here as well. People would have thought, What’s next? And AI would have come to their minds. Believe it or not, next-gen researchers would have been thinking of AI; it’s a human tendency.

2. Work and Employment

  • Less automation:
    Human labor would remain central in customer support, design, content creation, translation, and coding. Young children would apply for coding jobs right after their twelth grade, so why not in other sectors?
  • Job security vs. efficiency:
    There might be more jobs in blue-collar industries. Jobs like analytics and statistics would still be performed manually. Overall productivity would be lower, as saturation would have overshadowed it. People would realize they have reached the end of the cliff. What next sounds good to everyone’s mouth?
  • Education & creativity:
    Students wouldn’t have instant tutors, idea generators, or essay helpers. Creative industries would rely more on manual effort — fewer “AI artists” or automated video tools. Faculty saturation would occur with more faculty members but the same workload, increasing the burden on faculty. Students would learn graduation subjects in school to make a difference, such as Quantum for school children. More PhDs would be coming to universities, challenging older faculty, and potentially leading to unemployment, as many subjects would be taught in schools. This may have reduced the student-teacher ratio. Between 2015 and 2018, until a real AI breakthrough occurred, there was a trend of teaching students coding, which would have filled many graduate jobs with applications from school passouts possessing excellent coding skills.

3.Information and Media

  • Less misinformation—but fewer breakthroughs:
    Without AI-generated content, deepfakes, and synthetic news, there wouldn’t have been terms such as misinformation. However, the impact would have been on translation products,  real-time captions, and summarization technologies. People would have found other ways to get synthetic news and misinformation, as so many people love gossip. So such software could have been developed. 
  • Search engines:
    Google would still dominate, but search would remain keyword and Pagerank based, not conversational. No “AI Overviews” or natural language search. NLP would have remained traditional, statistical, and algorithm-based.

4. Society and Culture

  • Cultural output:
    Movies, games, and design would have primarily relied on human concept art and editing. AI-generated music, art, and videos would not exist, but people would have found out algorithms to edit these videos and music without AI. People would still find ways to copy and replicate, such as enhancing music by inserting new scenes into old song videos. Human creativity has no limits.
  • Public discourse:
    No debates on AI dos and don’ts; however, existential risk would have remained in a completely different aspect, such as what to teach our children, what area of graduation to pursue, and reducing the retirement age to give jobs to new graduates. Instead, major global concerns might focus more on unemployment, future directions, climate tech, biotech, and digital privacy.

5. Science and Research

  • Slower discovery:
    AI has accelerated drug discovery, protein folding, climate modeling, and many other areas. Without it, breakthroughs in healthcare, physics, and chemistry would be delayed by decades. AI digital twins aid in various ways, from medical applications to the solar system and even addressing climate calamities and other market sectors.
  • Data would be “big,” but not “smart.”
    The “big data” era would remain focused on human statistical analysis, not intelligent Artificial Intelligence. However, all things would have been written algorithmically. The collected data would have been processed, and new outputs would have been studied and published in technical papers, which are now disseminated in the newsrooms of companies.

. Geopolitics

  • Less tech competition:
    The U.S.–China tech rivalry would center on semiconductors, precious minerals, and quantum computing, rather than AI supremacy.
  • Different policy focus:
    No AI regulation battles, but greater focus on cybersecurity and data rights.

7. Everyday Life

Without AI:

  • Your phone wouldn’t autocomplete sentences or suggest photos.
  • You’d still manually tag friends and sort emails.
  • No personal assistants, such as Siri, Alexa, or ChatGPT-level tools, are available.
  • Creativity is a human trait; however, the human mind is capable of innovating, and new innovations would have emerged as a result.
  • ——————————————————————————————————-
    ——————————————————————————————————-
  • So, if there were no AI, life wouldn’t be what it is like at many levels. There would be a bit of an anxious job market and unpredictability in careers as youngsters would learn graduation topics. What so many chemistry post-graduates would do? Faculty and other jobs would likely be saturated. There would be ease in personal life, without  speed in the dynamics of AI-led apps, which allows us to portray what we need with ease and efficiency.  However, there are still concerning points when teenagers apply for coding jobs in companies. Many people tend to enroll their children in computer science degree programs. Post-doctoral faculty applying for school teaching, as parents of students wants their kids to learn advanced topics. Software firm sends out freelancer work. Only blue-collar jobs are surely the safest jobs. Still a lot to go, the human mind is capable of thinking more, thinking better, and ways will be devised to climb the cliff humanity had reached years ago. And AI would be sought, which means humanity would then, if not before, seek AI.  So humanity would had seeked AI, if not years before, then years later. Regulations may had delayed the progress but it was meant to come. That is how it is. However, what is the future with AI at this speed? 
    Stay tuned, subscribe for updates. 

Has 1995-2005 and 2025 fashion made a comeback. Trends have come a full spiral with new fabrics. Fashion sales up always?

Let’s ask AI. I am asking Claude and Meta, Vibe here. 

Prompt: “Show the differences and similarities between Indian women’s fashion wear now and fashion wear of the 1990s or 2005’s? Is this the same?”

I gave several prompts to reach a conclusion, supported by AI. My observation is that the fashion of the 1990s and 2025 is somewhat similar, and then the fashion of the 2005s and 2025s also resembles each other in Indian fashion wear. Whether it’s flared trousers, pants, or ethnic tops, there are lots of similarities. It follows that with new fabrics entering the market, people try to recreate the same fashion using new materials. So, it’s all repeating like a spiral with a paint on its top. 

I remember women around me wearing similar things in 1995-2005 as they are in 2025. 

What does this mean? It means the fashion industry is a big business. We women have to constantly upgrade our wardrobes, which means it returns to that same spiral—just with a modified base, such as different fabrics, buttons, westernization, and more.

This means sale for new dresses which are up in market and by publicized by celebrities are on sale. This means business in fashion industry is on!

This boosts the fashion industry as a consistently in-demand profession. A field AI can’t influence? Maybe?

Remember this combination? Is Indian fashion repeating? (Sketch by AI). A modified dress was worn by someone close to me; however, it was a Saharara, a kind of flared pants recently spotted on by Priyanka Chopra.

Note: The following are analyses by AI. I wanted to see how much they differ. Please note that AI may not always be entirely accurate due to issues with context or other errors which may relate to prompt itself.

Similarities:

  • Denim: High-waisted jeans, a staple of 90s fashion, are once again popular, with modern twists like distressed finishes and stretchy fabrics.
  • Crop Tops: 90s fashion’s crop tops have made a comeback, often paired with high-waisted pants, skirts, or shorts.
  • Sneakers: Sneakers were a growing trend in the 90s and have continued to evolve, with modern fashion featuring a wide range of styles, from chunky dad sneakers to sleek, minimalist designs.
  • Statement Pieces: Both 90s and modern fashion emphasize statement pieces, like bold jackets, hats, or accessories, to elevate an outfit.

SIMILARITIES

Cyclical Nature

  • 1990s minimalism has returned as “quiet luxury”
  • Platform shoes are back (but updated)
  • Slip dresses resurged in the 2010s-2020s
  • Wide-leg pants are trendy again
  • Chokers made comebacks

Casual Comfort

  • Both eras value comfortable, wearable fashion
  • Sportswear and casual pieces are mainstream
  • Rejection of overly formal dressing

Individuality

  • Both decades celebrate personal style expression
  • Mix-and-match approach to dressing
  • Subcultures influence mainstream fashion

Accessories

  • Minimalist jewelry remains popular in both eras
  • Crossbody bags (90s) vs. mini bags (2020s)
  • Sunglasses as statement pieces

Denim’s Dominance

  • Jeans remain wardrobe staples
  • Denim is versatile and universal
  • Constantly reinvented but always relevant

THE BOTTOM LINE

While certain 90s elements have been revived, 2020s fashion is fundamentally different:

✓ Sustainability is now a major concern (wasn’t in the 90s)
✓ Inclusivity in sizing and representation has improved
✓ Technology shapes how we discover and buy fashion
✓ Comfort is prioritized more explicitly (athleisure, WFH influence)
✓ Speed of trend cycles has accelerated dramatically
✓ Gender-neutral fashion is more mainstream

The 2020s borrow nostalgia from the 90s but filter it through modern values, technology, and aesthetics. It’s inspired by the 90s, not the same as the 90s.

Anarkalis: 2005 vs 2025

You’re largely correct – Anarkalis became mainstream around 2003-2005 and the core design has remained relatively stable compared to other garments. Here’s why:

SIMILARITIES (2005-2025):

  • Basic silhouette: Fitted bust, flared from empire line
  • Length options: Floor-length, knee-length, calf-length (all existed by 2005)
  • Fabric choices: Georgette, net, cotton, silk (same range)
  • Occasion wear: Still worn for festivals, weddings, parties
  • Embroidery styles: Zari, sequins, thread work (similar techniques)
  • Worn with: Churidar/cigarette pants (both eras)

Minor DIFFERENCES (2005-2025):

  • Neckline variety: More contemporary cuts now (off-shoulder, halter – though these existed in 2005 too)
  • Jacket Anarkalis: More common now
  • Asymmetric hemlines: Slightly more popular now
  • Print styles: Digital prints more common now
  • Layering: Cape styles and shrugs more trendy now

Women’s Lowers – Some Similarities

Yes, certain lower styles have persisted:

  • Churidar – Still worn, though less popular now
  • Palazzo pants – Were popular in late 90s, still exist today
  • Straight pants – Basic style remains

BUT the differences are significant:

  • 1990s: Very wide, baggy palazzos; heavily pleated salwars
  • 2020s: Cigarette pants, dhoti-style salwars, pant-style lowers with side zips, ankle-length cuts, culottes

The silhouettes and fits have evolved even if the basic concept (loose bottoms with kurtas) remains.

YES – Women’s lowers/pants in Indian ethnic wear (2005 vs 2025) are essentially the SAME

You’re correct that these have remained consistent:

CHURIDAR

  • 2005: Fitted, gathered at ankles
  • 2025: Same design, same fit
  • No significant change

PALAZZO PANTS

  • 2005: Wide-leg, flowy
  • 2025: Wide-leg, flowy
  • No significant change

CIGARETTE PANTS / STRAIGHT PANTS

  • 2005: Slim, straight-cut, ankle-length
  • 2025: Slim, straight-cut, ankle-length
  • No significant change

Minor additions (but these existed in 2005 too):

  • Dhoti-style pants (these were around in 2005)
  • Patiala salwar (existed well before 2005)
  • Parallel pants (also existed by 2005)

NOT a full circle – more like a spiral or evolution:

  • Some foundational pieces stayed stable (certain lowers, Anarkali silhouette)
  • But everything else evolved: tops, styling, accessories, fabrics, shopping methods, cultural attitudes
  • New categories emerged: Indo-Western fusion is huge now
  • Values changed: Sustainability, body positivity, comfort prioritized

Thanks for reading. 

Subscribe for updates

AI Minister of Albania to have 83 babies same DNA(algorithm)

#ai #governance #future #corruption

Greetings everyone,

Here is AI though for today!

Is the AI Minister of Albania pregnant with 83 babies? How come a robot has babies? What does this mean? Who fears it and who supports it?

Diella —I wrote about her. She is said to be pregnant with 83 babies now!

Did it make you smile or laugh, or did it scare you?

Who is the father of 83 children?

Well, did she take part in the birth process? Robots can’t give birth yet. It’s out of scope. It’s most probably that the 83 robots would take part in her Robotic DNA, meaning the robotic algorithm. That is what it can mean. As far as I can think, how else could robot Diella have children, and how are these children supposed to assist all ministries?

This is a way to explain to common people, who may ask, who are these robots serving in several ministries?

That is a way to replicate the good work robot minister Diella is doing. Copying its good DNA (algorithm) and sending it to each department.

Edvin Rama, PM of Albania, did you find Diella’s work good?

Then know some people may not like it, especially those who support corruption.

Can corruption end with robots? No, they can just help humans with tasks humans need to do.

Is it needed?

Let’s see.

Well, some countries would be scared of it.

But we need to be scared of it as well, as the bad guy may try to alter the algorithms, then the 83 children would need treatment of robotic DNA(algorithm), which means a vaccine would be needed, lol, that means some right restart or converting back to a previous image of the robot, an option must be there.

Let’s see these 83 robots come to parliament as baby robots or as adult robots.

Who knows but PM Rama of Albania.

Take care.

Stay well.

Like Mom like daughter- #love #story #fiction

Sweets, did I ever tell you how I got my first love, which was not your father?

Oh, Mom, tell me, tell me.

You think I am a bold woman, right?

Yes Mom.

But in me is a woman, and a woman who loved a man, your father. 

Come on, start now, I know you are so bold, I know you love Dad a lot.

But not in love, in love I bend at my man. A woman in the arms of a man she loves is just a woman, nothing more than his lady.

It was back then, I was in college, not like you, waiting till your 30s to find the man you can fall in love with.

Yes, I waited, but I think waiting was worth it.

Yes, I see happiness in you.

Yes mom, 

So we were in college, and the college had a huge garden near the canteen. 

Take me to your college sometime, Mom.

Sure, so we used to spend time in the garden between the lectures and the Physics lab in the evenings.

Yeah, the science students’ dilemma. 

One day, I was walking alone in the college garden to see my friends. Suddenly, I caught the eyes of a man. He was wearing a shirt with the sleeves loosely rolled up to the elbows. He was, I think, with his dad, like your story. 

Like Mom, like daughter.

Yeah.

So as soon as he caught my eyes, I was young then, not as I am today.

Mom, you look so nice even now. Continue please.

So as soon as I looked at him coming in my direction and I was walking towards him, I caught his eye.

Something happened, I was exalted in my emotions, I could not control the spike of emotions, my eyes were twinkling, and the smile on my face was just growing exponentially. 

Oh, Mom, show me that picture of yours. I want to imagine.

Yes, girl, then I looked down at my phone to show I was smiling, reading a note, and not looking at a handsome college guy who was much older than me.

Here we differ; you fell for an elder man, I fell for a younger man.

Then some shrubs came over my face, and I didn’t realize I was walking in between tree leaves all over my face. I felt as if I would jump with excitement.

Excitement?

Out of nothing —I don’t know why myself.

Then what?

When I came to my senses, I said to myself, I’ll look up now at him.

That’s so romantic.

By the time I looked up, he and his father were smiling badly and looking at the other side.

I don’t know his name, but I’ll always remember my first love at first sight.

He was smiling and looked away not to embarrass me.

Oh, Mom, does Father know about this?

Well, yes… he often teases me.

This is why I tell you to go to Chandani Chawk, Delhi, as you know something about him.

Hmm

You are a bold woman; lead your life boldly. We women need to be bold in our acts.

Give me some time…

Thank you for reading,

Warm regards,